DSS Initiative to Adopt a More Holistic Evaluation of FOCI Boards
Client Alert | 1 min read | 09.19.18
On August 31, 2018, the Defense Security Service (DSS) issued a white paper suggesting an initiative to expand the considerations it evaluates in reviewing nominations and performance of Outside Directors or Proxy Holders (OD/PHs) serving on Boards of Directors of FOCI-mitigated entities. Specifically, DSS intends to evaluate nominees for OD/PH positions not just on their personal backgrounds but also in the context of the entire Board, suggesting that it considers OD/PH Board members to be able to contribute experience beyond a national security background. While many companies already consider such factors when identifying nominees for OD/PH positions, the new initiative suggests DSS will be seeking such justifications in the review process and hints that it may require specific OD/PH training and on-going internal or external reviews of FOCI Boards and OD/PH performance. One bit of good news is a suggestion that the strict prohibition on an OD/PH having any prior relationship with the FOCI-mitigated entity may be relaxed.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 4 min read | 02.19.26
Proposed NY Legislation May Mean Potential Criminal Charges for Unlicensed Crypto Firms
On January 14, 2026, State Senator Zellnor Myrie proposed legislation in the New York State Senate that would amend New York law to make it a criminal offense to operate a virtual currency business in New York without the proper license. By introducing the possibility of criminal penalties, Senate Bill S. 8901, the Cryptocurrency Regulation Yields Protections, Trust, and Oversight Act (CRYPTO Act), would mark a significant regulatory shift in the state’s oversight of virtual currency businesses, given New York’s prominence in virtual currency regulation in the U.S.
Client Alert | 2 min read | 02.18.26
Client Alert | 4 min read | 02.18.26
Federal Court Rules Some AI Chats Are Not Protected by Legal Privilege: What It Means For You
Client Alert | 6 min read | 02.18.26
The CeramTec Case, or How to (not) Navigate the Patent to Trademark Transition


