DSS Initiative to Adopt a More Holistic Evaluation of FOCI Boards
Client Alert | 1 min read | 09.19.18
On August 31, 2018, the Defense Security Service (DSS) issued a white paper suggesting an initiative to expand the considerations it evaluates in reviewing nominations and performance of Outside Directors or Proxy Holders (OD/PHs) serving on Boards of Directors of FOCI-mitigated entities. Specifically, DSS intends to evaluate nominees for OD/PH positions not just on their personal backgrounds but also in the context of the entire Board, suggesting that it considers OD/PH Board members to be able to contribute experience beyond a national security background. While many companies already consider such factors when identifying nominees for OD/PH positions, the new initiative suggests DSS will be seeking such justifications in the review process and hints that it may require specific OD/PH training and on-going internal or external reviews of FOCI Boards and OD/PH performance. One bit of good news is a suggestion that the strict prohibition on an OD/PH having any prior relationship with the FOCI-mitigated entity may be relaxed.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 5 min read | 08.26.26
D.C. Circuit Upholds Designation of PFOA and PFOS as CERCLA Hazardous Substances
In a significant and unanimous ruling, the D.C. Circuit upheld the Environmental Protection Agency’s (“EPA”) final rule designating perfluorooctanoic acid (“PFOA”) and perfluorooctanesulfonic acid (“PFOS”) as “hazardous substances” under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (“CERCLA”), denying the petitions of seven industry groups seeking to overturn that designation.[1] CERCLA, also known as the “Superfund Statute,” allows EPA to require potentially responsible parties to fund cleanup of hazardous substances.
Client Alert | 5 min read | 08.26.26
Client Alert | 6 min read | 08.26.26
The Risky Fifth: A Long Hot Summer in Congressional Jurisprudence
Client Alert | 4 min read | 08.25.26
DOJ Signals Increased Antitrust Scrutiny of Algorithmic Pricing in Willow Bridge Decision


