1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |DOL Overtime Rules Enjoined

DOL Overtime Rules Enjoined

Client Alert | 1 min read | 11.23.16

A federal district judge in Texas yesterday issued a nationwide preliminary injunction barring the U.S. Department of Labor from implementing new regulations increasing the minimum salary necessary for employees to qualify for many of the “white collar” overtime exemptions permitted under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA). The rule was scheduled to be effective next Thursday, December 1. The DOL issued a statement yesterday that it disagreed with the decision and was considering all options. An emergency appeal of the court’s order is possible.

The decision will cause most employers to reassess their plans to comply with the new rule. Many companies have initiated compliance programs that call for increasing salaries of affected employees. Other plans are intended to convert employees to non-exempt status, making them eligible for overtime pay. Complex financial, operational and human resources issues are presented by the court’s order.

The court’s decision adopted the principal arguments advanced by plaintiffs in two consolidated cases brought in September challenging the DOL rule. The court concluded that DOL lacked authority under the FLSA to issue the new rule. According to the court, the new rule effectively adopted a “salary-only” test for FLSA exemption status, a result that is contrary to the FLSA’s requirement that DOL “define and delimit” the white collar exemptions with reference to the job duties actually performed by affected employees.

We are closely following developments in the litigation. We’re also working with clients on how to respond to the uncertainty created by yesterday’s ruling. Watch this space for additional updates.

Contacts

Insights

Client Alert | 6 min read | 11.19.25

Buying Peace: The Importance of Releasing FCA Liability When Resolving Criminal Allegations of Fraud Against the Government

The facts before the Third Circuit in the recently decided case of Patel v. United States illustrate how parties can put themselves in a bind if they make factual admissions when resolving a criminal case involving fraud on the government while not simultaneously resolving the government’s civil claims under the False Claims Act (FCA) for the same underlying conduct....