DOL Compliance Guidance for Health Plans
Client Alert | 1 min read | 05.15.03
The Department of Labor (DOL) has initiated a compliance assistance program to help employers, health plans and health insurers satisfy the requirements of certain federal health laws, such as the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA), the Mental Health Parity Act, the Newborns' and Mothers' Health Protection Act, and the Women's Health and Cancer Rights Act. In general, health plans covered by ERISA are subject to these laws, with certain limited exceptions for small businesses.
The HIPAA Compliance Assistance Program (H-CAP) is designed to address specific compliance issues. H-CAP is one of a number of programs sponsored by the DOL and Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to encourage and assist benefit plans with voluntary compliance with ERISA and the Internal Revenue Code. H-CAP consists of three major parts:
(1) new DOL publications designed to assist group health plans and health insurers comply with the laws,
(2) a new section of the DOL's Web page devoted to health law material at http://www.dol.gov/ebsa/compliance_assistance.html#section2, and
(3) DOL sponsorship of compliance assistance workshops around the U.S.
The new publications include a self-audit checklist for plans and employers; a guide summarizing the notice requirements of the various laws, including sample language; and tips for avoiding the 15 most common mistakes made by health plans and their sponsors. The list includes such matters as "hidden" pre-existing condition limitations, timely provision of special enrollment notices and certificates of creditable coverage and non-confinement clauses.
In light of DOL's increasing audit activity in the health plan area, these tools are a useful starting point to monitor plan compliance, but are not a substitute for a full HIPAA compliance review.
If you have any questions or need any additional information, please contact your regular Crowell & Moring contact or any attorney on our Health Care team.
Insights
Client Alert | 5 min read | 12.12.25
Eleventh Circuit Hears Argument on False Claims Act Qui Tam Constitutionality
On the morning of December 12, 2025, the Eleventh Circuit heard argument in United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Florida Medical Associates, LLC, et al., No. 24-13581 (11th Cir. 2025). This case concerns the constitutionality of the False Claims Act (FCA) qui tam provisions and a groundbreaking September 2024 opinion in which the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida held that the FCA’s qui tam provisions were unconstitutional under Article II. See United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Fla. Med. Assocs., LLC, 751 F. Supp. 3d 1293 (M.D. Fla. 2024). That decision, penned by District Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle, was the first success story for a legal theory that has been gaining steam ever since Justices Thomas, Barrett, and Kavanaugh indicated they would be willing to consider arguments about the constitutionality of the qui tam provisions in U.S. ex rel. Polansky v. Exec. Health Res., 599 U.S. 419 (2023). In her opinion, Judge Mizelle held (1) qui tam relators are officers of the U.S. who must be appointed under the Appointments Clause; and (2) historical practice treating qui tam and similar relators as less than “officers” for constitutional purposes was not enough to save the qui tam provisions from the fundamental Article II infirmity the court identified. That ruling was appealed and, after full briefing, including by the government and a bevy of amici, the litigants stepped up to the plate this morning for oral argument.
Client Alert | 8 min read | 12.11.25
Director Squires Revamps the Workings of the U.S. Patent Office
Client Alert | 8 min read | 12.10.25
Creativity You Can Use: CJEU Clarifies Copyright for Applied Art
Client Alert | 4 min read | 12.10.25
Federal Court Strikes Down Interior Order Suspending Wind Energy Development
