DOJ Signals That It Will Increase FCA Enforcement to Curb Opioid Crisis in the Most Meritorious Cases
Client Alert | 1 min read | 03.13.18
The Department of Justice (DOJ) has signaled that it will increase its use of the False Claims Act (FCA) to address the opioid crisis. Addressing the Federal Bar Association’s Qui Tam Conference on February 28th, Deputy Associate Attorney General Stephen Cox stated that the FCA “provides the government with a powerful tool to pursue all of those in the opioid distribution chain that are responsible for the improper marketing, distribution, prescription and diversion of opioids” and that it is a tool that DOJ is “increasingly using to address the opioid crisis.” Mr. Cox also emphasized that the department would only focus on the most meritorious cases. He referred to the Brand Memo, issued earlier this year, to reiterate that DOJ would not use agency guidance to create legal obligations in FCA enforcement. He also alluded to the Granston Memo from January, which contains internal department guidelines for exercising dismissal authority of qui tam cases. Mr. Cox concluded that DOJ “takes its responsibility seriously” and will move to dismiss “where necessary to protect the long-term interests of both the government and relators.” (A full transcript of the address can be found here).
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 2 min read | 06.15.26
Kansas Federal Court Applies “Selective Enforcement” Theory to Reject DTSA Claim
A Kansas federal court held that inconsistent enforcement of trade secret rights can defeat a claim under the Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA). In Edelman Financial Engines, LLC v. Mariner Wealth Advisors LLC, No. 2:23-cv-02515-HLT (D. Kan. June 5, 2026), the court applied a selective enforcement theory, holding that when a company does not consistently pursue legal remedies against similarly situated former employees, that inconsistency can be affirmative evidence that it failed to protect its trade secrets. While the selective enforcement theory has appeared in academic hypothetical discussions, the decision appears to be one of the clearest judicial applications of a “selective enforcement” theory in a trade secret case.
Client Alert | 3 min read | 06.12.26
Client Alert | 4 min read | 06.12.26
Auto Dealers: The FTC Is Back in the Driver’s Seat — Warning Letters Signal Renewed Federal Scrutiny
Client Alert | 13 min read | 06.12.26

