DOJ Signals That It Will Increase FCA Enforcement to Curb Opioid Crisis in the Most Meritorious Cases
Client Alert | 1 min read | 03.13.18
The Department of Justice (DOJ) has signaled that it will increase its use of the False Claims Act (FCA) to address the opioid crisis. Addressing the Federal Bar Association’s Qui Tam Conference on February 28th, Deputy Associate Attorney General Stephen Cox stated that the FCA “provides the government with a powerful tool to pursue all of those in the opioid distribution chain that are responsible for the improper marketing, distribution, prescription and diversion of opioids” and that it is a tool that DOJ is “increasingly using to address the opioid crisis.” Mr. Cox also emphasized that the department would only focus on the most meritorious cases. He referred to the Brand Memo, issued earlier this year, to reiterate that DOJ would not use agency guidance to create legal obligations in FCA enforcement. He also alluded to the Granston Memo from January, which contains internal department guidelines for exercising dismissal authority of qui tam cases. Mr. Cox concluded that DOJ “takes its responsibility seriously” and will move to dismiss “where necessary to protect the long-term interests of both the government and relators.” (A full transcript of the address can be found here).
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 1 min read | 07.08.26
CAS Board Publishes Final Rule Rescinding CAS 404, 408, 409, and 4117
As part of its ongoing effort to conform the Cost Accounting Standards (“CAS”) to generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), the CAS Board published a final rule rescinding CAS 408 (Accounting for costs of compensated personal absence) and CAS 411 (Accounting for acquisition costs of material). The CAS Board also rescinded CAS 404 (Capitalization of tangible assets) and CAS 409 (Depreciation of tangible capital assets) but retained certain requirements of CAS 404 and 409, which will be located in new paragraphs of CAS 405 (Accounting for unallowable costs). Specifically, the CAS Board retained the requirements currently located at CAS 404-50(d)(1), CAS 409-50(e)(5), CAS 409-50(j)(1), and CAS 409-50(j)(4), which the CAS Board explained are necessary to protect the Government’s interests. Otherwise, the CAS Board determined that the requirements of CAS 404, 408, 409, and 411 overlapped with GAAP such that GAAP “may be applied reasonably as a substitute for CAS to support contract cost and pricing.”
Client Alert | 1 min read | 07.08.26
Crowell & Moring and Crowell GovCon Strategies at Farnborough International Airshow 2026
Client Alert | 10 min read | 07.08.26
Proactive Compliance in Health Care: “Getting Ahead” of Enforcement in 2026 and Beyond
Client Alert | 2 min read | 07.08.26
When Sharing Becomes Collusion: Bipartisan AG Settlement Outlines Pricing Compliance

