DOJ Issues Merger Process Reforms
Client Alert | 1 min read | 12.18.06
The Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice recently announced a series of important reforms to its merger review process. These reforms are designed to improve the efficiency of the Division's investigations, and to reduce both the cost and time required to complete merger investigations in which a "Second Request" has been issued pursuant to the Hart-Scott-Rodino ("HSR") Antitrust Improvements Act.
At the core of the DOJ's issued reforms is a voluntary option through which companies may be able to significantly reduce the burden of complying with a Second Request. In exchange for the parties' agreement to certain timing and other procedural agreements, the Division announced that it will limit the scope of a Second Request to require only the production of responsive materials from a firm's central files and a targeted list of no more than 30 employees. The Division also announced a change in its Model Second Request, reducing the default search period from between three to four years to two years prior to the date of the request's issuance. These reforms recognize that explosive growth in the amount of electronic data stored by firms has substantially increased the volume of material potentially responsive to a Second Request, and are intended to provide a mechanism to reduce the burden of production. These reforms are largely similar to those issued earlier by the Federal Trade Commission, although they provide a more flexible mechanism with respect to the length of the second waiting period following the parties' certification of compliance with the Second Request.
In addition to these changes, the Division also announced that it will seek greater participation by the parties to a transaction during the initial 15-or 30-day waiting period. Through more substantive consultation, including the issuance of voluntary information requests and interviews with corporate representatives, this initiative is intended to further facilitate a more efficient and effective merger review process.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 4 min read | 02.20.26
SCOTUS Holds IEEPA Tariffs Unlawful
On February 20, 2026, the Supreme Court issued a pivotal ruling in Trump v. V.O.S. Selections, negating the President’s ability to impose tariffs under IEEPA. The case stemmed from President Trump’s invocation of IEEPA to levy tariffs on imports from Canada, Mexico, China, and other countries, citing national emergencies. Challengers argued—and the Court agreed—that IEEPA does not delegate tariff authority to the President. The power to tariff is vested in Congress by the Constitution and cannot be delegated to the President absent express authority from Congress.
Client Alert | 7 min read | 02.20.26
Section 5949 Proposed Rule Puts the FAR Council's Chips on the Table
Client Alert | 5 min read | 02.20.26
Trump Administration Pursues MFN Pricing for Prescription Drugs
Client Alert | 4 min read | 02.19.26
Proposed NY Legislation May Mean Potential Criminal Charges for Unlicensed Crypto Firms

