DOJ Allows Hiring of Foreign Official under the FCPA
Client Alert | 1 min read | 04.23.10
On April 19, 2010, the United States Department of Justice ("DOJ") issued its first FCPA Opinion Procedure Release of 2010, and the first since August 2009.
The Release was requested by a U.S. company ("the Company") (a "domestic concern" within the meaning of the FCPA) which had entered into a contract with a U.S. government agency to design and build a facility in a foreign country. This contract required the Company to hire individuals to work at the facility as directed by the U.S. government agency.
Pursuant to the contract and at the request of the foreign country, the U.S. government agency directed the Company to hire a local individual as the Facility Director. However, this individual was simultaneously serving as a paid officer for an agency of the foreign country's government, and was therefore a "foreign official" under the FCPA.
DOJ opined that it would not pursue an enforcement action under these circumstances since the Company was contractually bound to hire and pay the foreign official, and only did so at the direction of the U.S. Government Agency. Notably, DOJ acknowledged that the individual's services as Facility Director were "separate and apart from" the services performed by the individual as a foreign official. In an apparent nod to the fact that the FCPA only prohibits payments that are made "corruptly," DOJ also noted that the Company would not gain any improper advantage by hiring the Facility Director since the individual did not have any role in matters affecting the Company vis-à-vis his government.
For the release, go to: http://www.justice.gov/criminal/fraud/fcpa/opinion/2010/1001.pdf
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.21.25
On November 7, 2025, in Thornton v. National Academy of Sciences, No. 25-cv-2155, 2025 WL 3123732 (D.D.C. Nov. 7, 2025), the District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed a False Claims Act (FCA) retaliation complaint on the basis that the plaintiff’s allegations that he was fired after blowing the whistle on purported illegally discriminatory use of federal funding was not sufficient to support his FCA claim. This case appears to be one of the first filed, and subsequently dismissed, following Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche’s announcement of the creation of the Civil Rights Fraud Initiative on May 19, 2025, which “strongly encourages” private individuals to file lawsuits under the FCA relating to purportedly discriminatory and illegal use of federal funding for diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives in violation of Executive Order 14173, Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity (Jan. 21, 2025). In this case, the court dismissed the FCA retaliation claim and rejected the argument that an organization could violate the FCA merely by “engaging in discriminatory conduct while conducting a federally funded study.” The analysis in Thornton could be a sign of how forthcoming arguments of retaliation based on reporting allegedly fraudulent DEI activity will be analyzed in the future.
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.20.25
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.20.25
Client Alert | 6 min read | 11.19.25
