1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |DOJ Allows Hiring of Foreign Official under the FCPA

DOJ Allows Hiring of Foreign Official under the FCPA

Client Alert | 1 min read | 04.23.10

On April 19, 2010, the United States Department of Justice ("DOJ") issued its first FCPA Opinion Procedure Release of 2010, and the first since August 2009.

The Release was requested by a U.S. company ("the Company") (a "domestic concern" within the meaning of the FCPA) which had entered into a contract with a U.S. government agency to design and build a facility in a foreign country. This contract required the Company to hire individuals to work at the facility as directed by the U.S. government agency.

Pursuant to the contract and at the request of the foreign country, the U.S. government agency directed the Company to hire a local individual as the Facility Director. However, this individual was simultaneously serving as a paid officer for an agency of the foreign country's government, and was therefore a "foreign official" under the FCPA.

DOJ opined that it would not pursue an enforcement action under these circumstances since the Company was contractually bound to hire and pay the foreign official, and only did so at the direction of the U.S. Government Agency. Notably, DOJ acknowledged that the individual's services as Facility Director were "separate and apart from" the services performed by the individual as a foreign official. In an apparent nod to the fact that the FCPA only prohibits payments that are made "corruptly," DOJ also noted that the Company would not gain any improper advantage by hiring the Facility Director since the individual did not have any role in matters affecting the Company vis-à-vis his government.

For the release, go to: http://www.justice.gov/criminal/fraud/fcpa/opinion/2010/1001.pdf

Contacts

Insights

Client Alert | 3 min read | 06.03.26

Important EU Court Judgment Clarifies Rules on Interest Due in Cartel Damages Cases

In a judgment that will have direct and immediate consequences, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) has clarified that for all competition damages actions brought after 26 December 2014, interest runs from the date on which the harm occurred. The ruling addressed two important questions: (1) whether national provisions implementing Article 3(2) of the EU Damages Directive — which requires interest to run from the date harm occurred —apply to cases in which the harm preceded the adoption of those provisions; and (2) how the date of harm should be determined in cartel cases involving the purchase of goods at inflated prices....

View All Insights