DoD Issues Class Deviations on SAT, MPT, TINA and CAS Thresholds
Client Alert | 1 min read | 04.27.18
On April 13, 2018, the Director of Defense Pricing/Defense Procurement and Acquisition Policy (DPAP) issued two class deviations – Class Deviation 2018-O0012 related to the threshold for obtaining certified cost or pricing data (CCOPD) (the CCOPD Deviation) and Class Deviation 2018-O0013 addressing the Simplified Acquisition Threshold (SAT), Micro-Purchase Threshold (MPT), and Special Emergency Procurement Authority (the SAT/MPT Deviation) (which supersedes and rescinds Class Deviations 2017-O0007 and 2018-O0001).
In particular, and effective July 1, 2018, the CCOPD Deviation directs contracting officers to “use $2 million as the threshold for obtaining [CCOPD],” thereby implementing Section 811 of the FY 2018 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA). This deviation also recognizes that the CCOPD threshold and “the threshold for the applicability of the cost accounting standards [(“CAS”)]” are linked to and, thus, also increases the CAS threshold to $2 million effective July 1, 2018, through the use of the clauses provided by the deviation.
The SAT/MPT Deviation, on the other hand, is effective immediately and:
- Increases the SAT for most DoD procurements to $250,000, thereby implementing Section 805 of the FY 2018 NDAA (the SAT is higher for certain types of procurements, e.g. contingency operations).
- Reiterates that the MPT for most DoD procurements has increased to $5,000 and provides the exceptions where the MPT is higher.
- Implements/continues to implement other sections in the FY 2017 and FY 2018 NDAAs by, for example, authorizing “supplies or services that are to be used to facilitate recovery from a cyber-attack be treated as commercial items” and changing “the thresholds for set-asides for small business in the Small Business Act from specified dollar amounts to the terms ‘micro-purchase threshold’ and ‘simplified acquisition threshold.’”
Insights
Client Alert | 8 min read | 09.09.25
On September 5, 2025, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) withdrew its appeals of decisions issued by Texas and Florida federal district courts, which enjoined the FTC from enforcing a nationwide rule banning almost all noncompete employment agreements. Companies, however, should not read this decision to mean that their noncompete agreements will no longer be subjected to antitrust scrutiny by federal enforcers. In a statement joined by Commissioner Melissa Holyoak, Chairman Andrew Ferguson stressed that the FTC “will continue to enforce the antitrust laws aggressively against noncompete agreements” and warned that “firms in industries plagued by thickets of noncompete agreements will receive [in the coming days] warning letters from me, urging them to consider abandoning those agreements as the Commission prepares investigations and enforcement actions.”
Client Alert | 12 min read | 09.09.25
Client Alert | 7 min read | 09.08.25
California’s Climate Disclosure Laws Continue to Roll Forward
Client Alert | 3 min read | 09.08.25
RADV Audits: Implications and Recommendations for Medicare Advantage Organizations