DoD Implements Franken Amendment For Non-Commercial Contracts
Client Alert | 1 min read | 03.04.10
On February 17, DOD issued a class deviation implementing the prohibitions of the "Franken Amendment" to the 2010 Defense Appropriations Act restricting the use of arbitration clauses in employment contracts and will consider comments received within two weeks of publication date in the formulation of an interim rule incorporating the clause into the DFARS (http://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/policy/policyvault/USA000476-10-DPAP.pdf). Under the new DFARS clause, 252.222-7999, which is only applicable to new non-commercial contracts or orders in excess of $1 million that utilize funds appropriated by the FY10 Act, contractors agree (1) not to enter into any agreement with any of its employees that require, as a condition of employment, that the employee agree to resolve through arbitration certain types of employment disputes; (2) not to enforce such clauses in existing contracts; and (3) for contracts awarded after June 17, 2010, to require covered subcontractors to comply with these requirements.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 5 min read | 08.21.26
FTC Proposes Enforcement Policy Statement on Personalized Pricing: What Businesses Need to Know
On August 19, 2026, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced a proposed Enforcement Policy Statement on personalized pricing — the practice of companies using consumers’ personal data to set individualized prices, discounts, coupons, or other incentives. The proposed statement, which is open for public comment for 30 days following publication in the Federal Register, marks a major step up in the FTC’s focus on data-driven pricing strategies and puts businesses across industries on notice that undisclosed or inadequately disclosed personalized pricing will not be tolerated. Importantly, while the proposed statement is not a binding legal requirement and does not create new legal obligations, it serves as an enforcement warning that the FTC is prepared to use its existing enforcement authority under Section 5 of the FTC Act (Section 5) and is also a potential harbinger of rulemaking. Businesses that engage in — or are considering — personalized pricing should carefully assess their disclosure practices and data collection procedures against the standards articulated in this statement.
Client Alert | 7 min read | 08.19.26
CMS’s Final Rule Bans Federal Medicaid Funding for Youth Gender-Affirming Care
Client Alert | 2 min read | 08.19.26

