Deadline for Costa Rica to Join CAFTA-DR Extended
Client Alert | 1 min read | 11.04.08
Tolling Period on Recovery of Textile/Apparel Import Duties from CAFTA Countries Expected to Begin on January 1, 2009
On August 2, 2005 the United States-Dominican Republic-Central America Free Trade Agreement (CAFTA) was signed into law in the United States. CAFTA is a regional free trade agreement (FTA) among seven signatories (Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua and the United States).
For importers/exporters of apparel and textile articles, CAFTA provides an opportunity to enjoy not only preferential access to markets prospectively, but also retroactive duty refunds for qualifying merchandise. Specifically, CAFTA provides for reciprocal duty free access for textile and apparel goods, retroactive to January 1, 2004. To qualify, products must meet the CAFTA's rule of origin and refunds must be requested, processed and compliant with Customs and Border Protection (CBP) regulations.
Requests for retroactive refunds are due 90 days after the last country enters into the agreement. The agreement has been entered into force by all signatory countries, except Costa Rica. Costa Rica approved CAFTA by national referendum in October 2007, but must still implement legislation required to carry out its obligations under the agreement. While progress has been made, the Costa Rican government needs additional time to adopt necessary implementing legislation before CAFTA can enter into force for Costa Rica.
Under CAFTA, Costa Rica was required to implement these laws by March 2008, however, the six current CAFTA countries have agreed to extend the deadline for Costa Rica's entering the agreement until January 1, 2009. Based on this extension, it is expected that the deadline for filing refund claims for originating textile and apparel imports will be April 1, 2009.
Please contact a member of the Crowell and Moring duty recovery team for assistance in quantifying and processing refunds.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.21.25
On November 7, 2025, in Thornton v. National Academy of Sciences, No. 25-cv-2155, 2025 WL 3123732 (D.D.C. Nov. 7, 2025), the District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed a False Claims Act (FCA) retaliation complaint on the basis that the plaintiff’s allegations that he was fired after blowing the whistle on purported illegally discriminatory use of federal funding was not sufficient to support his FCA claim. This case appears to be one of the first filed, and subsequently dismissed, following Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche’s announcement of the creation of the Civil Rights Fraud Initiative on May 19, 2025, which “strongly encourages” private individuals to file lawsuits under the FCA relating to purportedly discriminatory and illegal use of federal funding for diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives in violation of Executive Order 14173, Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity (Jan. 21, 2025). In this case, the court dismissed the FCA retaliation claim and rejected the argument that an organization could violate the FCA merely by “engaging in discriminatory conduct while conducting a federally funded study.” The analysis in Thornton could be a sign of how forthcoming arguments of retaliation based on reporting allegedly fraudulent DEI activity will be analyzed in the future.
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.20.25
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.20.25
Client Alert | 6 min read | 11.19.25
