1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |Crowdsourcing Patent Examination with the Patent Prosecution Highway

Crowdsourcing Patent Examination with the Patent Prosecution Highway

What You Need to Know

  • Key takeaway #1

    The PPH can be a useful tool for streamlining global prosecution of corresponding patent applications—which in turn can reduce costs and increase the chances of successful prosecution.

Client Alert | 1 min read | 05.15.23

The Patent Prosecution Highway (PPH) is a work-share arrangement between the patent offices of different countries. It allows for participating patent offices to share—and thus benefit from—work already performed by other participating patent offices.

In short, when a claim (or claims) of a patent application is allowed in a first patent office, a PPH request may be made to fast-track the examination of a corresponding application in a second patent office based on that allowance. So, for example, when a U.S. patent application is allowed, that allowance can be used to fast-track examination in corresponding foreign applications—or vice versa.

For U.S. applicants, the USPTO also requires that: (1) the claims of the U.S. application correspond in scope to the allowed claims of the foreign application, and (2) substantive examination of the U.S. application has not yet begun. Other countries’ requirements may differ.

Successfully utilizing the PPH can significantly reduce the time it takes for the second patent office to conduct its examination—and it is intended to do just that. While additional benefits may vary from country to country, applications examined under the PPH also generally have higher rates of allowance and suffer less from duplicative examination.

These benefits can streamline global prosecution and reduce overall costs for applicants, particularly in view of the ever growing number of countries participating in PPH programs. Presently, the USPTO has PPH agreements with patent offices of the Europe Union, United Kingdom, China, Japan, Taiwan, Mexico, Israel and several other countries and regions.

For additional information on the PPH, including country specific requirements and PPH strategies for your patent portfolio, please contact your trusted partners at Crowell & Moring.

Contacts

Insights

Client Alert | 1 min read | 07.08.26

CAS Board Publishes Final Rule Rescinding CAS 404, 408, 409, and 4117

As part of its ongoing effort to conform the Cost Accounting Standards (“CAS”) to generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”), the CAS Board published a final rule rescinding CAS 408 (Accounting for costs of compensated personal absence) and CAS 411 (Accounting for acquisition costs of material).  The CAS Board also rescinded CAS 404 (Capitalization of tangible assets) and CAS 409 (Depreciation of tangible capital assets) but retained certain requirements of CAS 404 and 409, which will be located in new paragraphs of CAS 405 (Accounting for unallowable costs).  Specifically, the CAS Board retained the requirements currently located at CAS 404-50(d)(1), CAS 409-50(e)(5), CAS 409-50(j)(1), and CAS 409-50(j)(4), which the CAS Board explained are necessary to protect the Government’s interests.  Otherwise, the CAS Board determined that the requirements of CAS 404, 408, 409, and 411 overlapped with GAAP such that GAAP “may be applied reasonably as a substitute for CAS to support contract cost and pricing.”...

View All Insights