1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |Cost Disallowance Claim Accrued When the Government Paid Invoices

Cost Disallowance Claim Accrued When the Government Paid Invoices

Client Alert | 1 min read | 09.11.18

In United Liquid Gas Co. v. GSA (July 12, 2018), the Civilian Board of Contract Appeals found that the government’s cost disallowance claim was untimely under the Contract Disputes Act’s six-year statute of limitations. Following an audit, GSA filed a $3.3 million claim alleging that the contractor overbilled GSA on a fixed-price per gallon propane contract. The Board held that GSA’s claim began to accrue on the date that the Government paid each invoice. GSA argued unsuccessfully that, before the audit, it could not have known of the overbilling because the invoices were paid by a separate agency (the Defense Finance and Accounting Service). The Board responded that GSA was “obligated to monitor [the] payments” and thus “should have known about the overpayment[s].” Because each invoice payment was treated as a separate event for claim accrual purposes, the Board denied as time-barred roughly $280,000 of GSA’s claim that involved payments more than six years before the claim was filed.

Insights

Client Alert | 6 min read | 11.26.25

From ‘Second’ to ‘First:’ Federal Circuit Tackles Obvious Claim Errors

Patent claims must be clear and definite, as they set the boundaries of the patentee’s rights. Occasionally, however, claim language contains errors, such as typographical mistakes or incorrect numbering. Courts possess very limited authority to correct such errors. The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has emphasized that judicial correction is appropriate only in rare circumstances, where (1) the error is evident from the face of the patent, and (2) the proposed correction is the sole reasonable interpretation in view of the claim language, specification, and prosecution history. See Group One, Ltd. v. Hallmark Cards, Inc., 407 F.3d 1297, 1303 (Fed. Cir. 2005) and Novo Indus., L.P. v. Micro Molds Corp., 350 F.3d 1348, 1357 (Fed. Cir. 2003)....