1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |Contractors File Suit Against New York MTA’s New Debarment Regime

Contractors File Suit Against New York MTA’s New Debarment Regime

Client Alert | 1 min read | 12.05.19

On November 25, 2019, the Alliance For Fair and Equitable Contracting Today, Inc. (AFFECT) sued the Metropolitan Transportation Authority (MTA) in the Southern District of New York to enjoin and declare unconstitutional a new contractor debarment regime implemented by the New York legislature and the MTA on November 6, 2019. This new debarment regime—upon which there was no opportunity for public comment—requires, among other things, the MTA to automatically debar a contractor that fails to complete a project by a contractual deadline or claims costs in excess of a project budget, without providing the MTA discretion to even consider mitigating facts or circumstances that might impact project deadlines or budgets. This applies both prospectively to new contracts and retroactively to all contracts already in existence, including those entered into before April 2019, when the New York legislature passed the new Debarment Statute requiring the implementation of this regime. The regime also applies to a targeted contractor’s (1) “parent(s), subsidiaries and affiliates”; (2) “directors, officers, principals, managerial employees and any person or entity with a 10% or more interest in a contractor”; and (3) “any joint venture (including its individual members) and any other form of partnership (including its individual members) that includes a contractor or a contractor’s parent(s), subsidiaries, or affiliates of a contractor.” AFFECT’s lawsuit alleges this regime violates the U.S. Constitution’s Contract Clause, Supremacy Clause, Dormant Commerce Clause, procedural and substantive Due Process requirements, and the First Amendment. If not successfully enjoined, this may encourage the New York State Legislature to enact similar laws and require other state agencies to establish similar debarment regimes, and may even motivate other states to do the same.

Insights

Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.21.25

A Sign of What’s to Come? Court Dismisses FCA Retaliation Complaint Based on Alleged Discriminatory Use of Federal Funding

On November 7, 2025, in Thornton v. National Academy of Sciences, No. 25-cv-2155, 2025 WL 3123732 (D.D.C. Nov. 7, 2025), the District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed a False Claims Act (FCA) retaliation complaint on the basis that the plaintiff’s allegations that he was fired after blowing the whistle on purported illegally discriminatory use of federal funding was not sufficient to support his FCA claim. This case appears to be one of the first filed, and subsequently dismissed, following Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche’s announcement of the creation of the Civil Rights Fraud Initiative on May 19, 2025, which “strongly encourages” private individuals to file lawsuits under the FCA relating to purportedly discriminatory and illegal use of federal funding for diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives in violation of Executive Order 14173, Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity (Jan. 21, 2025). In this case, the court dismissed the FCA retaliation claim and rejected the argument that an organization could violate the FCA merely by “engaging in discriminatory conduct while conducting a federally funded study.” The analysis in Thornton could be a sign of how forthcoming arguments of retaliation based on reporting allegedly fraudulent DEI activity will be analyzed in the future....