Contractor Using Alleged Infringing Method Is Immune from Patent Infringement Suit
Client Alert | 1 min read | 02.22.07
In Sevenson Environmental Services, Inc. v. Shaw Environmental, Inc. (Nos. 06-1391 & -1408; February 21, 2007), the Federal Circuit affirms the district court's decision that a suit against a contractor was barred by government-contractor immunity under 28 U.S.C. § 1498 ("Section 1498"). Sevenson sued Shaw for infringing several patents directed to treating hazardous waste by applying phosphoric acid. In response, Shaw asserted that the U.S. government was the proper defendant under Section 1498, and the district court agreed. On appeal, the Federal Circuit states that Shaw's work under the contract explicitly required the use of the infringing method, and, therefore, Shaw was immune. The panel further states that questions of contract interpretation in contractor-immunity cases are governed by Federal Circuit law.
Insights
Client Alert | 3 min read | 08.03.26
On July 20, 2026, New Jersey Governor Mikie Sherrill signed the Forbidding the Algorithmic Inflation of Rent (FAIR) Act into law, making New Jersey the fourth state to regulate algorithmic rent-setting practices. Three days later, on July 23, 2026, Governor Sherrill signed the Fair Price Protection Act, which targets “surveillance pricing”—the practice of using or collecting personal data about a user and using an algorithm or artificial intelligence to charge different consumers different prices for the same products. Together, these laws represent a significant expansion of New Jersey's consumer protection framework in the algorithmic pricing context.
Client Alert | 6 min read | 08.03.26
The Pipe, Not the Posts: How Section 230’s Protections Extend to Generative AI Platforms
Client Alert | 4 min read | 07.31.26
Client Alert | 3 min read | 07.31.26
