Contracting Officer's Final Decision Not Afforded RES Judicata Status
Client Alert | less than 1 min read | 05.10.04
In Roxco, Ltd. v. United States (Mar. 29, 2004), the COFC, among other things, rejected the Air Force's argument that Roxco's equitable adjustment claims, which were submitted more than a year after the Contracting Officer's default termination decision, should be barred through the application of res judicata, even if, as the Air Force asserted, those claims could have been raised as defenses to the default termination. The COFC reasoned that an extension of res judicata to contracting officers' final decisions would contradict the Contract Disputes Act's six-year statutory time limit for filing claims.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 6 min read | 05.12.26
EU Pharma Package: Advertising Compromise Proposal
In our ninth alert in this EU Pharma Package Series, we discussed the proposals of the Commission, Council, and Parliament with respect to advertising of medicinal products.
Client Alert | 5 min read | 05.12.26
NYDFS Ramps Up Health Care Cybersecurity Enforcement With $2.25 Million Settlement
Client Alert | 5 min read | 05.12.26
The International Claims Commission for Ukraine (ICCU): What Claimants Need to Know
Client Alert | 5 min read | 05.12.26
