1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |Companies to Divest Newsprint Mill in Arizona to Preserve Competition

Companies to Divest Newsprint Mill in Arizona to Preserve Competition

Client Alert | 1 min read | 10.25.07

U.S. Dept. of Justice News Release

The U.S. Department of Justice announced Tuesday that it will require two of the nation's largest newsprint manufacturers – Abitibi-Consolidated Inc. and Bowater Inc.– to divest a newsprint mill in Arizona in order to proceed with their proposed $1.6 billion transaction. The Department said that the merger, as originally proposed, would have substantially lessened competition in the production and sale of newsprint in North America.

Under the proposed consent decree, Abitibi and Bowater agree to divest Abitibi's newsprint mill in Snowflake, Arizona. The Snowflake mill is one of the largest and most profitable newsprint mills in North America. In addition, the merged company will be required to notify the Department before acquiring an additional interest in any mill or machine that is currently jointly-owned by either Abitibi or Bowater with any third party, if the value of the acquisition exceeds $2 million.

Abitibi is a Canadian corporation based in Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Abitibi owns 12 paper mills worldwide that produce newsprint, including 11 in the United States and Canada. In 2006, Abitibi reported worldwide sales of approximately $4.8 billion, including about $1.7 billion in North American newsprint sales.

Bowater is a Delaware corporation based in Greenville, S.C. Bowater owns nine mills that produce newsprint, eight of which are in the United States and Canada. In 2006, Bowater reported total sales of approximately $3.5 billion, including approximately $1.1 billion in North American newsprint sales.


Insights

Client Alert | 5 min read | 09.03.25

If You’re Not First, You’re Last: Federal Circuit’s First Review of an AIA Derivation Proceeding

Nearly a decade and a half after the passage of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (“AIA”), the Federal Circuit finally had its first occasion to review an appeal of a derivation proceeding that was litigated before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“Board”) in Global Health Solutions LLC v. Selner. This case provides helpful guidance for patent litigators regarding the proper legal framework in a derivation proceeding and serves as a reminder that patent applications should be filed as soon as possible. As the facts of this case show, it is important that inventors retain documents and other evidence of the conception of their invention, as well as its communication to others, should there be any challenge to their invention....