CMS Proposes Definition Of Meaningful Use Of EHR; ONC Publishes Interim Final Rule Regarding EHR Certification And Standards
Client Alert | 1 min read | 01.05.10
On December 31, 2009, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) announced proposed rules to implement provisions of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (Recovery Act) relating to the adoption of Electronic Health Records (EHR) and other Health Information Technology (HIT). The new regulations would provide standards and guidance for programs designed to encourage "eligible professionals" (EP), eligible hospitals, and critical access hospitals (CAH) to make "meaningful use" of EHRs and HIT. Providers making "meaningful use" of EHRs and HIT qualify for higher Medicare payments.
"Meaningful use" is a term defined by CMS, applicable to both Medicare and Medicaid, and describes the use of HIT that furthers the secure exchange of information and coordination of care among health care professionals; reduces health disparities; engages patients and their families in healthcare; and improves quality, safety, efficiency, and overall public health. CMS's proposed rule uses a three-stage process, requiring increasingly more robust criteria for demonstrating meaningful use. The first stage, which begins in 2011, focuses on "electronically capturing health information in a coded format, using that information to track key clinical conditions, communicating that information for care coordination purposes, and initiating the reporting of clinical quality measures and public health information."
To qualify as a meaningful EHR user for 2011, CMS would require an EP or eligible hospital to demonstrate that they meet several dozen objectives and their associated measures as set forth in 42 C.F.R. § 495. CMS will ensure compliance with these standards initially through attestation, but eventually through direct submission of clinical quality measures via EHR technology. Based on the results of the first phase, CMS intends to propose through future rulemaking two additional stages of the criteria for meaningful use, beginning in 2013 and 2015 respectively.
Insights
Client Alert | 7 min read | 12.17.25
After hosting a series of workshops and issuing multiple rounds of materials, including enforcement notices, checklists, templates, and other guidance, the California Air Resources Board (CARB) has proposed regulations to implement the Climate Corporate Data Accountability Act (SB 253) and the Climate-Related Financial Risk Act (SB 261) (both as amended by SB 219), which require large U.S.-based businesses operating in California to disclose greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and climate-related risks. CARB also published a Notice of Public Hearing and an Initial Statement of Reasons along with the proposed regulations. While CARB’s final rules were statutorily required to be promulgated by July 1, 2025, these are still just proposals. CARB’s proposed rules largely track earlier guidance regarding how CARB intends to define compliance obligations, exemptions, and key deadlines, and establish fee programs to fund regulatory operations.
Client Alert | 1 min read | 12.17.25
Client Alert | 7 min read | 12.17.25
Executive Order Tries to Thwart “Onerous” AI State Regulation, Calls for National Framework
Client Alert | 4 min read | 12.17.25
The new EU Bioeconomy Strategy: a regulatory framework in transition
