1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |CMS Issues Proposed Rule to Revise Medicare Parts C and D Regulations

CMS Issues Proposed Rule to Revise Medicare Parts C and D Regulations

Client Alert | 1 min read | 10.07.11

On October 3, 2011, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) released on the Federal Register's Electronic Public Inspection Desk a new proposed rule designed to implement revisions to the Medicare Advantage (MA) program (Part C) and prescription drug benefit program (Part D) regulations. The revisions address a number of goals, namely: "to implement new statutory requirements; strengthen beneficiary protections; exclude plan participants that perform poorly; improve program efficiencies; and clarify program requirements." In addition, CMS is considering revisions to the long term care facility conditions of participation requirements for pharmacy services. Comments on the proposed rule will be due 60 days after publication in the Federal Register, which has been slated for Tuesday, Oct. 11. Among the revisions considered, highlights include:

  • Implementation of Affordable Care Act with regard to the consolidation of prior guidance on the Coverage Gap Discount Program and implementation of Pharmacy Benefit Manager reporting requirements under Part D;
  • Implementation of MIPPA provision related to benzodiazepines and barbiturates as Part D drugs;
  • Provisions for beneficiary reinstatement into cost plans when good cause for failure to pay premiums can be established;
  • Provision of uniform ID cards for MA plan enrollees and guidance related to the determination of creditable coverage for the retiree drug subsidy;
  • A process for Independent Review Entity (IRE) reconsideration of Part D coverage determinations;
  • Procedures and standards for the exclusion of poor performers in the Parts C and D programs;
  • Measures to reduce costs, including the elimination of the requirement to purchase print advertising announcing non-renewal of cost contractors, implementation of hospital-acquired conditions and present-on-admission indicator policy for MA plans, changes to rules regarding agent/broker compensation, and cost-sharing associated with trial fills of prescription drugs;
  • And further codification and clarification of prior guidance under Parts C and D.

Insights

Client Alert | 6 min read | 06.16.26

What United States v. Bankman-Fried Means for Health Care Fraud Defense

On the surface, United States v. Bankman-Fried is a case about the collapse of a cryptocurrency exchange. But the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit’s recent opinion — affirming Samuel Bankman-Fried’s conviction on seven counts of fraud and conspiracy — carries important lessons that extend well beyond the world of digital assets....