Class (Deviations) Dismissed: Biden Administration Rolls Back COVID-19 Emergency Measures
Client Alert | 1 min read | 04.20.23
On April 18, 2023, the Department of Defense (“DoD”) issued guidance to DoD contracting officers directing the cessation of certain emergency contracting measures utilized during the COVID-19 pandemic. Following the termination of the COVID-19 national emergency declaration through President Biden’s April 10, 2023 signing of H.J. Res. 7, DoD released a memorandum titled “Contracting Updates with the Termination of the COVID-19 Emergency,” which orders contracting officers to cease utilizing all “emergency acquisition flexibilities that were permitted by the national emergency declaration” and terminated all guidance implementing those flexibilities. The memorandum also identified class deviations issued during the pandemic that “will either be rescinded or addressed through a follow-on effort” including:
- Class Deviation 2020-O0010, which increased the progress payment rates to 90% for large businesses and 95% for small businesses, will be revised to return large businesses to the customary progress payment rate of 80% “in a manner that minimizes disruption” whereas DOD “anticipates” retaining the 95% rate for small businesses;
- Class Deviation 2020-O0012, which relaxed various DFARS requirements for undefinitized contract actions (“UCAs”), will be rescinded in full; and
- Class Deviation 2020-O0021-Rev. 3 and Class Deviation 2020-O0013-Rev. 4, which both relate to reimbursement of covered paid leave costs under CARES Act Section 3610, will be fully maintained until all reimbursement actions are complete.
While this memorandum only addresses to DoD contracts, contractors should watch for other federal agencies to terminate their pandemic-related emergency acquisition flexibility measures as the federal government emerges from the shadow of the COVID-19 pandemic. Government-wide pandemic-related requirements for government contractors—including the contractor vaccine mandate that remains unenforced and partially enjoined—may also terminate.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.21.25
On November 7, 2025, in Thornton v. National Academy of Sciences, No. 25-cv-2155, 2025 WL 3123732 (D.D.C. Nov. 7, 2025), the District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed a False Claims Act (FCA) retaliation complaint on the basis that the plaintiff’s allegations that he was fired after blowing the whistle on purported illegally discriminatory use of federal funding was not sufficient to support his FCA claim. This case appears to be one of the first filed, and subsequently dismissed, following Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche’s announcement of the creation of the Civil Rights Fraud Initiative on May 19, 2025, which “strongly encourages” private individuals to file lawsuits under the FCA relating to purportedly discriminatory and illegal use of federal funding for diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives in violation of Executive Order 14173, Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity (Jan. 21, 2025). In this case, the court dismissed the FCA retaliation claim and rejected the argument that an organization could violate the FCA merely by “engaging in discriminatory conduct while conducting a federally funded study.” The analysis in Thornton could be a sign of how forthcoming arguments of retaliation based on reporting allegedly fraudulent DEI activity will be analyzed in the future.
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.20.25
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.20.25
Client Alert | 6 min read | 11.19.25




