1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |Cardinal Change In MOD Requires Competition

Cardinal Change In MOD Requires Competition

Client Alert | less than 1 min read | 08.23.04

Continuing a recent trend of success by bid protesters in the Court of Federal Claims, in CW Gov't Travel, Inc. v. U.S. (Aug. 3, 2004), the court agreed that a modification to an existing contract of a competitor called for services outside the general scope of the original contract and that the work had to be competed. The protester attained this relief even though the mod had been effected a year previously.

Insights

Client Alert | 6 min read | 06.09.26

Is Stock-a-palooza Over? Supreme Court allows SEC to Pursue Disgorgement

On June 4, 2026, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously held that the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) can continue to pursue disgorgement as an equitable remedy in securities fraud cases without showing pecuniary loss by investors. The Court’s ruling in Sripetch v. SEC resolves a split between the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, which concluded that the SEC must demonstrate pecuniary loss, and the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the First and Ninth Circuits, which declined to require such a showing....