1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |Canadian CMMC? Canada Proposes Cyber Compliance Regime for Canadian Defense Suppliers

Canadian CMMC? Canada Proposes Cyber Compliance Regime for Canadian Defense Suppliers

Client Alert | 2 min read | 03.31.25

On March 12, 2025, the Government of Canada announced plans to launch the Canadian Program for Cyber Security Certification (CPCSC). CPCSC is a cybersecurity compliance verification program that aims to protect sensitive unclassified government information handled by Canadian government contractors and subcontractors within Canada’s defense sector. Canada will roll out CPCSC to contractors in four phases, with the first phase launching this month.

CPCSC’s structure appears closely aligned with the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) Cyber Maturity Model Certification (CMMC) program. Like CMMC, CPCSC is broken out into 3 compliance levels, will verify compliance via self, third-party, and government-conducted assessments, and will be included in Canadian government defense solicitations and other procurement opportunities.

However, CPCSC and CMMC have one key difference: as currently structured, they will evaluate contractors against fundamentally different security standards. CMMC assessments are primarily based on security controls from the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publication (NIST SP) 800-171, Revision 2. CPCSC, in contrast, will evaluate Canadian defense contractors against Canadian industrial security standard (ITSP 10.171), a Canadian government standard that mirrors NIST SP 800-171, Revision 3.

While this distinction may appear minor, there are significant differences between the security controls found in Revision 2 and Revision 3 of NIST SP 800-171. DoD has stated that CMMC will eventually adopt Revision 3, but to date all CMMC rulemaking and guidance materials have been tailored to Revision 2. Accordingly, reciprocity or mutual recognition for CMMC and CPCSC assessment and certifications does not appear feasible, at least for now. Simultaneously, however, DoD has begun socializing the possibility of contractors’ voluntary adoption of Revision 3, an approach that now merits more consideration for contractors supporting both countries’ defense supply chains.

Given the historically close ties between the U.S. and Canadian defense sectors, contractors on both sides of the border should watch closely for further updates from Canada on its phased rollout of CPCSC, updates from DoD regarding CMMC’s adoption of NIST SP 800-171, Revision 3, and any discussions of mutual recognition between the respective programs.

Contacts

Insights

Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.21.25

A Sign of What’s to Come? Court Dismisses FCA Retaliation Complaint Based on Alleged Discriminatory Use of Federal Funding

On November 7, 2025, in Thornton v. National Academy of Sciences, No. 25-cv-2155, 2025 WL 3123732 (D.D.C. Nov. 7, 2025), the District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed a False Claims Act (FCA) retaliation complaint on the basis that the plaintiff’s allegations that he was fired after blowing the whistle on purported illegally discriminatory use of federal funding was not sufficient to support his FCA claim. This case appears to be one of the first filed, and subsequently dismissed, following Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche’s announcement of the creation of the Civil Rights Fraud Initiative on May 19, 2025, which “strongly encourages” private individuals to file lawsuits under the FCA relating to purportedly discriminatory and illegal use of federal funding for diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives in violation of Executive Order 14173, Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity (Jan. 21, 2025). In this case, the court dismissed the FCA retaliation claim and rejected the argument that an organization could violate the FCA merely by “engaging in discriminatory conduct while conducting a federally funded study.” The analysis in Thornton could be a sign of how forthcoming arguments of retaliation based on reporting allegedly fraudulent DEI activity will be analyzed in the future....