1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |California Increases Antitrust Penalties

California Increases Antitrust Penalties

What You Need to Know

  • Key takeaway #1

    California increased civil and criminal antitrust penalties.

  • Key takeaway #2

    Uncertainty remains regarding whether courts will actually impose the increased penalties.

  • Key takeaway #3

    The California AG’s Antitrust Division can now use recovered fines to fund enforcement activities.

Client Alert | 1 min read | 10.27.25

Earlier this month, California enacted Senate Bill 763 (“SB 763”). The legislation amends the state’s long-standing antitrust statute, the Cartwright Act, to increase both criminal and civil maximum penalties for corporations and individuals.  California Attorney General Rob Bonta, whose office is responsible for enforcing the Cartwright Act and stands to benefit from any civil penalties recovered under the new law, sponsored the bill.

Under the new law, maximum corporate criminal fines for each violation will increase from $1 million to $6 million and individual maximum criminal fines will increase from $250,000 to $1 million per violation. In actions brought by the Attorney General or a district attorney, courts can impose civil penalties of up to $1 million per violation based on factors including nature, seriousness and persistence of the misconduct. The new law does not specify what constitutes a “violation” (e.g., whether it pertains to each anticompetitive agreement, or each sale at a supracompetitive price made pursuant to an anticompetitive agreement).  The law also gives the courts discretion to apply fines or penalties under the maximum statutory amounts.

California Attorney General Bonta is an active enforcer of California’s antitrust laws and an avid supporter of the bill.  The bill also provides that any damages or criminal fines recovered by the Attorney General will be deposited in the Attorney General’s antitrust account rather than the state’s general fund, as before.  This added source of funds may provide the Attorney General with additional resources and incentives to pursue antitrust enforcement.

Crowell & Moring’s team is closely monitoring these developments and is prepared to help your business navigate antitrust compliance and risk-mitigation strategies.

Insights

Client Alert | 3 min read | 08.03.26

New Jersey Takes Aim at Algorithmic and Surveillance Pricing: What Landlords and Retailers Need to Know About the FAIR Act and the Fair Price Protection Act

On July 20, 2026, New Jersey Governor Mikie Sherrill signed the Forbidding the Algorithmic Inflation of Rent (FAIR) Act into law, making New Jersey the fourth state to regulate algorithmic rent-setting practices. Three days later, on July 23, 2026, Governor Sherrill signed the Fair Price Protection Act, which targets “surveillance pricing”—the practice of using or collecting personal data about a user and using an algorithm or artificial intelligence to charge different consumers different prices for the same products. Together, these laws represent a significant expansion of New Jersey's consumer protection framework in the algorithmic pricing context....