1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |Belgian "Work from Home" Legislative Patchwork Now More Complex Following Supreme Court Decision

Belgian "Work from Home" Legislative Patchwork Now More Complex Following Supreme Court Decision

Client Alert | 2 min read | 10.30.20

In our recent alert How to Determine the Best Work from Home Strategy for Your Company with Belgium Back in COVID-19 Mandatory Telework Mode, you will find a table summarizing the three recognized forms of telework under Belgian law.

When it comes to structural telework (as opposed to occasional telework or COVID-19 telework at home), an agreement in writing (employment contract or addendum) must be entered into prior to the start of the telework. Article 6 of CBA n° 85 lists the provisions that should be included (frequency of telework, periods of availability, working place (home address or other), etc.).

However, on October 5, 2020, the Belgian Supreme Court ruled that the fact that an employer and an employee did not enter into an agreement in accordance with article 6 of CBA n° 85 did not necessarily mean that a system of structural telework had not been put into place.

The employee in the case concerned claimed an indemnity in accordance with article 119.6 of the Employment Agreements Act on “homeworkers” (huisarbeiders in Dutch, travailleurs à domicile in French). The employer contested this claim, arguing that the employee was teleworking in a situation where no homeworkers’ indemnity was due. The Labor court agreed with the employer, on the basis that there was no structural telework agreement as required by CBA n° 85 and, hence, no telework. The Supreme Court has now overturned this judgment.

This Supreme Court decision demonstrates just how important it is for employers to put in place a telework policy and determine clear rules on indemnities and cost reimbursement.

Note that the above does not relate to the current mandatory COVID-19 rules on telework at home, where no individual agreement between employer and employee is required. The facts presented to the Supreme Court date from before the COVID-19 pandemic.

Our team assists clients with the drafting or review of telework policies and employment contracts/addenda determining telework terms. We help our clients to define the best work from home strategies for their companies. We also continue to closely monitor all COVID-19 developments, and we are available to help companies through this crisis in the best possible way.

Insights

Client Alert | 7 min read | 12.17.25

CARB Proposes Regulations Implementing California GHG Emissions and Climate-Related Financial Risk Reporting Laws

After hosting a series of workshops and issuing multiple rounds of materials, including enforcement notices, checklists, templates, and other guidance, the California Air Resources Board (CARB) has proposed regulations to implement the Climate Corporate Data Accountability Act (SB 253) and the Climate-Related Financial Risk Act (SB 261) (both as amended by SB 219), which require large U.S.-based businesses operating in California to disclose greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and climate-related risks. CARB also published a Notice of Public Hearing and an Initial Statement of Reasons along with the proposed regulations. While CARB’s final rules were statutorily required to be promulgated by July 1, 2025, these are still just proposals. CARB’s proposed rules largely track earlier guidance regarding how CARB intends to define compliance obligations, exemptions, and key deadlines, and establish fee programs to fund regulatory operations....