Belgian Social Partners Reach Agreement on Four Key Social Topics
Client Alert | 34 min read | 06.16.21
On Tuesday June 8, 2021, the Belgian Group of Ten (i.e., the consultative body of trade unions and employers, the “social partners”) reached general agreement on four social topics. This agreement follows the government’s conciliation proposal to the social partners of May 2021, whereby the government instructed the social partners to find practical solutions with respect to the following four topics.
1. Increase in the minimum wage
The social partners decided to increase the minimum wage in four different steps:
- Step 1 will take place on April 1, 2022 and focus on the harmonization and the increase in the minimum wage. The cost of the increase for employers is to be compensated for as far as possible by a reduction in social security contributions. In addition, the social partners decided to abolish the age and seniority criteria attached to the calculation of the minimum wage. As a consequence, one minimum wage will apply to all (as of April 1, 2022): 1,702.00 EUR gross per month.
- Steps 2 and 3 are part of the fiscal reform and will take place on April 1, 2024 and April 1, 2026. The purpose is (i) to limit the additional costs for employers linked to the gross increase in the minimum wage and (ii) to ensure that the gross increases will effectively result in net increases for the employees.
- Step 4 will take place on April 1, 2028 and involve an evaluation in view of further increases (e.g., effect of the increase on sectoral minimum wages).
Summary:
2. Flexibility measures
The social partners have agreed on the following flexibility measures:
3. Unemployment with company allowance scheme (UCA)
The social partners decided on the following points with regard to unemployment with company allowance schemes:
4. Harmonization of supplementary pensions of blue and white collar employees
The social partners have decided:
- to postpone the deadline for the harmonization of the supplementary pensions of blue and white collar employees. The deadline is now January 1, 2030 (instead of January 1, 2025);
- to set a new deadline for the deposit of sectoral CBAs: January 1, 2027 (instead of January 1, 2023)
- for the years 2021-2022, to request that the joint committees make concrete efforts towards harmonizing the pension schemes;
- for the years 2023-2028, to devote part of the wage margin (at least 0.1%) to the harmonization;
- to maintain the status quo regarding the (para)fiscal rules (e.g., 8.86% of employer’s social security contributions); and
- to preserve the employee’s choice between a lump sum or an annuity.
5. Next steps?
The agreement reached between the social partners still has to be formally approved by the trade unions and by the board of directors of the Federation of Belgian Companies. This approval is expected to be given by the end of June 2021.
In addition, a royal decree from the federal government can be expected, in which the wage norm of 0.4% for the upcoming two years will be fixed.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.21.25
On November 7, 2025, in Thornton v. National Academy of Sciences, No. 25-cv-2155, 2025 WL 3123732 (D.D.C. Nov. 7, 2025), the District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed a False Claims Act (FCA) retaliation complaint on the basis that the plaintiff’s allegations that he was fired after blowing the whistle on purported illegally discriminatory use of federal funding was not sufficient to support his FCA claim. This case appears to be one of the first filed, and subsequently dismissed, following Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche’s announcement of the creation of the Civil Rights Fraud Initiative on May 19, 2025, which “strongly encourages” private individuals to file lawsuits under the FCA relating to purportedly discriminatory and illegal use of federal funding for diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives in violation of Executive Order 14173, Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity (Jan. 21, 2025). In this case, the court dismissed the FCA retaliation claim and rejected the argument that an organization could violate the FCA merely by “engaging in discriminatory conduct while conducting a federally funded study.” The analysis in Thornton could be a sign of how forthcoming arguments of retaliation based on reporting allegedly fraudulent DEI activity will be analyzed in the future.
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.20.25
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.20.25
Client Alert | 6 min read | 11.19.25
