Bad Faith Conduct Pervades Contract
Client Alert | less than 1 min read | 04.25.07
Judge Allegra of the Court of Federal Claims in a lengthy opinion in North Star Alaska Housing Corp v. U.S. (Apr. 2, 2007) finds that the Army's actions and attitudes soured a long-term contract with a housing project contractor and equated to bad faith. Among other things, the court faulted the Army for using its discretion to increase the costs of the contractor's performance, changing contract interpretations midstream to reduce the contractor's income, holding incentive payments hostage, denying meritorious claims to leverage others, and allowing the program personnel to dictate contracting positions to the contracting officers.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 6 min read | 06.16.26
What United States v. Bankman-Fried Means for Health Care Fraud Defense
On the surface, United States v. Bankman-Fried is a case about the collapse of a cryptocurrency exchange. But the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit’s recent opinion — affirming Samuel Bankman-Fried’s conviction on seven counts of fraud and conspiracy — carries important lessons that extend well beyond the world of digital assets.
Client Alert | 2 min read | 06.15.26
Kansas Federal Court Applies “Selective Enforcement” Theory to Reject DTSA Claim
Client Alert | 3 min read | 06.12.26
Client Alert | 4 min read | 06.12.26
Auto Dealers: The FTC Is Back in the Driver’s Seat — Warning Letters Signal Renewed Federal Scrutiny

