1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |Back to the Future: Personnel Security Clearance Process Back on GAO “High-Risk List”

Back to the Future: Personnel Security Clearance Process Back on GAO “High-Risk List”

Client Alert | 1 min read | 02.05.18

On January 25, 2018, GAO returned the personnel security clearance process to the “High-Risk List” of federal programs needing substantial attention, citing the delayed and backlogged investigations queue, slow reform of the clearance process, and lack of investigation quality metrics. GAO found that: the backlog had grown to over 700,000 by September 2017; the NBIB has too few investigators to significantly reduce the backlog; and an inter-agency reciprocity policy is not yet completed. From 2005-2011, DoD’s clearance process was on the List due to similar issues. GAO had removed the program because DoD and OPM had taken steps to improve timeliness and develop quality metrics. The program’s return to the List comes just as Congress has transferred responsibility for investigations back from OPM to DoD under the FY 2018 NDAA. Having held numerous security clearance reform and oversight hearings over the past decade, Congress may not react well to this development.

Insights

Client Alert | 7 min read | 10.29.26

7th EU Competition Law Conference, co-hosted by Crowell & Moring, King’s College London and the Competition Law Center at George Washington University

On 8 October 2026, Crowell & Moring, King's College London, and the Competition Law Center at George Washington University co-hosted the 7th EU Competition Law Conference at De Warande in Brussels. Mark Meador, Commissioner at the US Federal Trade Commission (FTC), delivered the opening keynote address, followed by four panels bringing together practitioners, regulators, academics, and in-house counsel to discuss the latest developments in EU, UK, and US competition law enforcement. Among other things, the panels examined algorithmic pricing; the European Commission's (Commission) new guidelines on exclusionary abuses under Article 102 TFEU (Article 102 Guidelines); the impact of dominant positions in merger reviews; and lessons from the enforcement of the Digital Markets Act (DMA) and the UK’s Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act. ...