1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |Are You Cyber Secure Under the DFARS Rule?

Are You Cyber Secure Under the DFARS Rule?

Client Alert | 1 min read | 09.17.14

With a revised regulatory regime still rippling through the defense industry, DoD fundamentally reshaped the cybersecurity rules in the DoD Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement in November 2013 by (1) imposing 51 mandatory security controls for DoD-controlled technical information; (2) requiring the DFARS "Safeguarding" clause in all DoD contracts and solicitations; (3) mandating that contractors flow down the requirements, even to commercial subcontractors; and (4) defining detailed reporting requirements for certain types of security  "incidents" or breaches. In a "View from Crowell & Moring: Getting Ahead of the DFARS Safeguarding Rule" published in Bloomberg BNA’s Federal Contracts Report, David Bodenheimer, Evan Wolff, and Kate Growley discuss the definitional gaps, compliance pitfalls, and practical pointers for determining the reach of the DFARS Safeguarding Rule, the mandate for "adequate security," the scope of the reporting requirements, and the emerging lessons learned in navigating these game-changing cybersecurity safeguards governing DoD procurements.


Contacts

Insights

Client Alert | 4 min read | 02.20.26

SCOTUS Holds IEEPA Tariffs Unlawful

On February 20, 2026, the Supreme Court issued a pivotal ruling in Trump v. V.O.S. Selections, negating the President’s ability to impose tariffs under IEEPA. The case stemmed from President Trump’s invocation of IEEPA to levy tariffs on imports from Canada, Mexico, China, and other countries, citing national emergencies. Challengers argued—and the Court agreed—that IEEPA does not delegate tariff authority to the President. The power to tariff is vested in Congress by the Constitution and cannot be delegated to the President absent express authority from Congress....