Are You Cyber Secure Under the DFARS Rule?
Client Alert | 1 min read | 09.17.14
With a revised regulatory regime still rippling through the defense industry, DoD fundamentally reshaped the cybersecurity rules in the DoD Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement in November 2013 by (1) imposing 51 mandatory security controls for DoD-controlled technical information; (2) requiring the DFARS "Safeguarding" clause in all DoD contracts and solicitations; (3) mandating that contractors flow down the requirements, even to commercial subcontractors; and (4) defining detailed reporting requirements for certain types of security "incidents" or breaches. In a "View from Crowell & Moring: Getting Ahead of the DFARS Safeguarding Rule" published in Bloomberg BNA’s Federal Contracts Report, David Bodenheimer, Evan Wolff, and Kate Growley discuss the definitional gaps, compliance pitfalls, and practical pointers for determining the reach of the DFARS Safeguarding Rule, the mandate for "adequate security," the scope of the reporting requirements, and the emerging lessons learned in navigating these game-changing cybersecurity safeguards governing DoD procurements.
Contacts

Partner, Crowell Global Advisors Senior Director
- Washington, D.C.
- D | +1.202.624.2698
- Washington, D.C. (CGA)
- D | +1 202.624.2500
Insights
Client Alert | 5 min read | 12.02.25
As we have reported previously, California has enacted a pair of climate-related reporting laws that apply to large entities doing business in California (SB 253 and SB 261, as modified by SB 219). This alert provides an update on only the most recent events; please see previous alerts for a broader overview of the laws’ requirements.
Client Alert | 11 min read | 12.01.25
Client Alert | 5 min read | 12.01.25
Client Alert | 6 min read | 11.26.25
From ‘Second’ to ‘First:’ Federal Circuit Tackles Obvious Claim Errors
