1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |Are You Cyber Secure Under the DFARS Rule?

Are You Cyber Secure Under the DFARS Rule?

Client Alert | 1 min read | 09.17.14

With a revised regulatory regime still rippling through the defense industry, DoD fundamentally reshaped the cybersecurity rules in the DoD Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement in November 2013 by (1) imposing 51 mandatory security controls for DoD-controlled technical information; (2) requiring the DFARS "Safeguarding" clause in all DoD contracts and solicitations; (3) mandating that contractors flow down the requirements, even to commercial subcontractors; and (4) defining detailed reporting requirements for certain types of security  "incidents" or breaches. In a "View from Crowell & Moring: Getting Ahead of the DFARS Safeguarding Rule" published in Bloomberg BNA’s Federal Contracts Report, David Bodenheimer, Evan Wolff, and Kate Growley discuss the definitional gaps, compliance pitfalls, and practical pointers for determining the reach of the DFARS Safeguarding Rule, the mandate for "adequate security," the scope of the reporting requirements, and the emerging lessons learned in navigating these game-changing cybersecurity safeguards governing DoD procurements.


Contacts

Insights

Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.13.26

Massachusetts Trade Secret Preliminary Injunctions: Prove the Harm, Tailor the Relief

A strong trade secret claim is not a substitute for proof of irreparable harm. In Daikin Applied Americas Inc. v. Russo, No. SJC-13881 (Mass. Oct. 14, 2026), the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court held that likely success on a misappropriation claim does not create a presumption of irreparable harm. The court grounded its ruling in both the Massachusetts Uniform Trade Secrets Act and the traditional equitable principles the statute incorporates. It required a case-specific showing that the requested relief would prevent harm that a final judgment could not adequately remedy. ...