1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |Animus Unnecessary for Improper Termination

Animus Unnecessary for Improper Termination

Client Alert | less than 1 min read | 04.09.13

In a decision that catalogued and continued the confusion in the Federal Circuit's case law concerning when a termination for convenience may be challenged as improper and, thus, give rise to breach damages, the CFC in Tigerswan, Inc. v. U.S. (Apr. 2, 2013) rebuffed the government's position that, to prevail, the contractor must always show a specific intent to harm the contractor. It then ruled that the contractor could not show a breach of good faith duties because the contract contained a termination clause, but then also ruled that actionable bad faith is shown if the government has engaged in improper self-dealing (which tracks the Restatement's definition of breach of good faith duties).


Insights

Client Alert | 5 min read | 03.30.26

The EU Pharma Package: The Transferable Exclusivity Voucher Compromise Proposal

In our third alert in this EU Pharma Package Series, we provided a detailed overview of the diverging positions of the European Commission, the European Parliament , and the Council of the European Union on the transferable exclusivity voucher (TEV) for priority antimicrobials....