'A Higher Ethical Obligation?' State Revenue Execs Speak Out in Crowell's Conversations
Client Alert | 1 min read | 01.15.14
Crowell & Moring's state tax team traveled from coast to coast in 2013 to introduce the corporate world to 10 of the country's top state tax decision makers. In Crowell's Conversations – a monthly column appearing in Bloomberg BNA's Weekly State Tax Report – we bring you timely and candid observations from different states' commissioners and their counsel. The revenue executives discussed everything from litigation and policy-making to resources and technology to their personal careers. While the questions and responses differed in each column, a common theme last year was the core belief that the states have a higher ethical obligation to get to the "right" answer rather than to collect the most revenue. We hope you have enjoyed getting to know our friends in the state revenue departments, and we look forward to bringing you more great interviews in 2014. Below are links to the first nine interviews.
- Michael Bryan, Director of the New Jersey Division of Taxation (December 6, 2013).
- Jozel Brunett, California Franchise Tax Board Chief Counsel (November 8, 2013).
- Julie Magee, Commissioner of the Alabama Department of Revenue (August 30, 2013).
- Tim Barfield, Secretary at the Louisiana Department of Revenue (July 19, 2013).
- Barbara Brohl, Executive Director and John Vecchiarelli, Senior Director of the Colorado Department of Revenue (June 21, 2013).
- Marshall Stranburg, Executive Director at the Florida Department of Revenue (May 3, 2013).
- Peter Franchot, Comptroller of Maryland (April 12, 2013).
- Milton Kimpson, General Counsel to the South Carolina Department of Revenue (March 15, 2013).
- Alan Levine, Chief Counsel With the District of Columbia's Office of Tax and Revenue (February 15, 2013).
Insights
Client Alert | 6 min read | 11.25.25
Brussels Court Clarifies the EU’s SPC Manufacturing Waiver Regulation Rules
On November 13, 2025, the president of the French-speaking Brussels Enterprise Court ruled in the long-running battle between Sandoz and Regeneron about the correct interpretation of the EU’s Supplementary Protection Certificate (SPC) Manufacturing Waiver Regulation regarding exports to a non-EU market. The Brussels Court dismissed Regeneron’s claim that Sandoz had provided a defective notification and agreed with Sandoz’s interpretation of the Regulation.
Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.24.25
Client Alert | 7 min read | 11.24.25
Draft Executive Order Seeks to Short-Circuit AI State Regulation
Client Alert | 5 min read | 11.24.25
Qatar Enacts Law No. (22) of 2025 on Persons with Disabilities
