A Common-Sense Change to the Continuous SAM Registration Requirement at FAR 52.204 7
Client Alert | 1 min read | 11.08.24
On November 12, 2024, the Department of Defense (DoD), General Services Administration (GSA), and National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) will issue an interim rule amending FAR 52.204-7 to clarify that an offeror’s failure to maintain System for Award Management (SAM) registration during the period between proposal submission and contract award does not render the offeror ineligible for award. Providing welcome relief to agencies and contractors alike, the interim rule requires only that an offeror be registered in SAM at the time of offer submission and at the time of contract award.
The interim rule comes in response to Court of Federal Claims (COFC) and GAO decisions that have strictly enforced the language of FAR 52.204-7 stating that “[a]n Offeror is required to be registered in SAM when submitting an offer or quotation and shall continue to be registered until time of award” and required contractors to maintain active SAM registration throughout the entire proposal and evaluation process. The COFC and GAO interpretation has been particularly frustrating for contractors and agencies due to the relatively draconian outcomes, such as rendering an offeror ineligible due to a single-day SAM registration lapse (at no fault of the offeror). Likewise, the COFC and GAO have prevented agencies from using discussions or corrective action to cure offerors’ SAM registration lapses, resulting in wasted resources for otherwise successful contractors, agencies losing best-value providers, and delays in mission execution.
The interim rule is effective upon publication on November 12, 2024, and will provide immediate relief to the procurement community. Interested parties have 60 days to provide comments before DoD, GSA, and NASA formulate the final rule. Crowell will continue to closely monitor regulatory and caselaw developments in this space.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 3 min read | 06.12.26
DOJ Guidance Backs Away From Disparate Impact Liability
On June 9, 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) issued a formal opinion concluding that the Equal Opportunity Employment Commission’s (EEOC) existing interpretations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII) disparate-impact liability, including the Uniform Guidelines on Employee Selection Procedures (UGESP), are unconstitutional. According to the opinion, EEOC’s prior interpretations contemplate liability based on disproportionately adverse effects alone, without regard to an employer’s likely intent, rather than treating disparate impact as an evidentiary mechanism to “smoke out” intentional discrimination. DOJ found that this approach functions as a “qualified racial-proportionality mandate” that places “a racial thumb on the scales, often requiring employers to evaluate the racial outcomes of their policies, and to make decisions based on (because of) those racial outcomes.” The opinion fulfills one mandate of Executive Order 14281, which rejected disparate-impact liability insofar as it “creates a near insurmountable presumption that unlawful discrimination exists wherever there are any differences in outcomes among different [demographic groups].”
Client Alert | 4 min read | 06.12.26
Auto Dealers: The FTC Is Back in the Driver’s Seat — Warning Letters Signal Renewed Federal Scrutiny
Client Alert | 13 min read | 06.12.26
Client Alert | 4 min read | 06.12.26
