1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |2024 GAO Bid Protest Report Shows Notable Decrease in Merit Decisions

2024 GAO Bid Protest Report Shows Notable Decrease in Merit Decisions

What You Need to Know

  • Key takeaway #1

    Bid protests remain an important oversight mechanism for the federal procurement system, with over half of GAO protests filed in FY 2024 resulting in the protester receiving some form of relief, such as voluntary corrective action or a GAO sustain recommendation.

  • Key takeaway #2

    GAO resolved far fewer protests on the merits than in prior years. Protesters should make every effort to put forth a strong initial protest, while agencies and intervenors should consider whether protest grounds are ripe for dismissal.

Client Alert | 9 min read | 11.20.24

On November 14, 2024, the U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) released its Annual Report on Bid Protests for Fiscal Year 2024, containing the full statistics shown below:

Bid Protest Statsitcs for Fiscal Years 2020 - 2024

 

 FY2024FY2023FY2022FY2021FY2020
Cases Filed¹1803 (down 11%)²2025 (increase of 22%)³1658 (down 12%)1897 (down 12%)2149 (down 2%)
Cases Closed⁴17062041165520172137
Merit (Sustain + Deny) Decisions387608455581545
Number of Sustains61188598584
Sustain Rate16%31%13%15%15%
Effectiveness Rate⁵52%57%51%48%51%
ADR⁶ (cases used)76697476124
ADR Success Rate⁷92%90%92%84%82%
Hearings⁸.2% (1 case)2% (22 cases).27% (2 cases)1% (13 cases)1% (9 cases)

The total number of protests filed (1,803) and sustained (61) decreased significantly from FY 2023’s near-record numbers—which were somewhat skewed, as GAO sustained over 100 protests in connection with a single government-wide acquisition contract—but largely aligned with historical numbers from FY 2021 and FY 2022.  This consistency is somewhat surprising considering recent anecdotal experience that protesters are increasingly turning to the Court of Federal Claims for their initial protest filings, and thus is worth keeping an eye on.

One statistic that did not align with historical norms, however, was the number of “Merit (Sustain + Deny) Decisions.”  Despite the number of protests filed being similar to prior years, GAO issued only 387 Merit Decisions—more than 25% fewer than the average for FY 2020 – FY 2023.  This decrease underscores the importance of effective initial protests—there is no guarantee that a bid protest will go the distance, so protesters should ensure that their initial protest grounds are as well-supported as possible to avoid dismissal.  Likewise, agencies and intervenors should strongly consider pursuing arguments that could lead to early dismissal. 

Regardless of the number of Merit Decisions, GAO’s 52% “Effectiveness Rate”—which is similar to recent years—shows that the protester received some form of relief, such as voluntary corrective action or a GAO sustain recommendation, in over half of protests filed.  The most prevalent grounds upon which GAO sustained protests in FY 2024 were (1) unreasonable technical evaluations; (2) flawed selection decisions; and (3) unreasonable cost or price evaluations.  The most prevalent grounds for sustained protests over the past ten years are shown in the table below:

Most Prevalent Sustain Grounds By Year

 

 

 

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

Flawed technical evaluation

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

 

Flawed cost/price evaluation

X

X

 

X

X

 

X

X

X

X

Flawed past performance evaluation

 

 

 

 

X

 

 

X

X

X

Flawed selection decision

X

X

X

 

 

X

X

 

X

 

Inadequate documentation

 

 

 

 

 

X

 

X

 

X

Unequal Treatment

 

 

 

X

 

X

 

 

 

 

Failure to follow evaluation criteria

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

X

Flawed solicitation

 

 

X

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

Flawed discussions

 

 

 

X

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Finally, GAO reported one instance in which an agency declined to follow a GAO sustain recommendation.  In Pernix Federal, LLC, B-422122.2, Mar. 22, 2024, 2024 CPD ¶ 73, GAO found that the State Department’s Security Act regulations conflicted with the agency’s interpretation of SAM registration requirements, and GAO recommended that the agency (1) reinstate the protester into the competition; (2) amend the solicitation to clarify the conflict; and (3) thereafter proceed with the procurement as appropriate.  The agency declined to follow GAO’s recommendation—a rarity.

We would like to thank Cherie J. Owen, Consultant, for her contribution to this alert.

Contacts

Insights

Client Alert | 5 min read | 12.12.25

Eleventh Circuit Hears Argument on False Claims Act Qui Tam Constitutionality

On the morning of December 12, 2025, the Eleventh Circuit heard argument in United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Florida Medical Associates, LLC, et al., No. 24-13581 (11th Cir. 2025). This case concerns the constitutionality of the False Claims Act (FCA) qui tam provisions and a groundbreaking September 2024 opinion in which the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida held that the FCA’s qui tam provisions were unconstitutional under Article II. See United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Fla. Med. Assocs., LLC, 751 F. Supp. 3d 1293 (M.D. Fla. 2024). That decision, penned by District Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle, was the first success story for a legal theory that has been gaining steam ever since Justices Thomas, Barrett, and Kavanaugh indicated they would be willing to consider arguments about the constitutionality of the qui tam provisions in U.S. ex rel. Polansky v. Exec. Health Res., 599 U.S. 419 (2023). In her opinion, Judge Mizelle held (1) qui tam relators are officers of the U.S. who must be appointed under the Appointments Clause; and (2) historical practice treating qui tam and similar relators as less than “officers” for constitutional purposes was not enough to save the qui tam provisions from the fundamental Article II infirmity the court identified. That ruling was appealed and, after full briefing, including by the government and a bevy of amici, the litigants stepped up to the plate this morning for oral argument....

View All Insights