• Tufts University, B.S. (2001) cum laude
  • Boston University School of Law, J.D. (2005) cum laude


  • New York
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO)
  • Massachusetts (Inactive)
  • U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York
  • U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York
  • U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Texas
  • U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Michigan
  • U.S Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

Scott L. Bittman


Scott L. Bittman focuses on intellectual property litigation, inter partes reviews, counseling, and patent and trademark procurement. He has significant experience in a wide variety of technologies, litigating cases before federal district courts throughout the country, the Patent Trial and Appeals Board, the International Trade Commission, and the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.

Scott's extensive technology experience includes litigated cases involving hybrid vehicle control technology, wheelchair suspensions, playards, train control systems, email authentication technology, power tools, power over Ethernet, machine vision software, toothpaste formulations, and web-based telecommunications. He has an extensive patent post-issuance review practice, which has included representing clients in all aspects of numerous IPRs. In addition, Scott has litigated cases related to trade secret misappropriation, trademark enforcement, false advertising, and unfair competition.

As part of Scott's counseling activities, he assists clients with the evaluation of patents and trademarks of third parties and renders detailed opinions relating to patent invalidity, noninfringement, and unenforceability. He also advises clients concerning IP procurement and enforcement strategies. Scott’s procurement work encompasses drafting and prosecuting patent applications relating to a variety of technologies as well as drafting and prosecuting trademark applications. He also prepares IP licenses and performs due diligence relating to IP issues in corporate transactions.

Prior to law school, Scott worked as a design engineer for a global corporation specializing in electronic monitoring, testing, and display instruments.

Scott also maintains an active pro bono practice. In recognition of his efforts, Scott has been identified as an "Empire State Counsel" by the New York State Bar Association.

Scott is a partner in the Patent and ITC Litigation Group in Crowell & Moring’s New York office.

Representative Matters

  • In re Certain Playards & Strollers (ITC). Representing Graco Children’s Products Inc. and its supplier, Wonderland Nurserygoods of Taiwan, in an ITC action against Baby Trend and three of its suppliers concerning infringement of four patents related to Graco’s Pack ’n Play playards and foldable strollers. 
  • Invacare Corp. v. Sunrise Medical (US) LLC (D.Del.). Representing plaintiff Invacare in patent infringement action involving seven patents relating to wheelchair stabilization technology.
  • BMW of North America, LLC v. Paice LLC (PTAB). Representing BMW as Petitioner in three IPR proceedings related to hybrid vehicle control technology.
  • Siemens Mobility, Inc. v. Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies (D. Del., PTAB, Fed. Cir.). Represented Siemens in a wide-ranging, multi-forum intellectual property dispute involving Positive Train Control technology, including a jury trial win resulting in a finding of willful infringement and a $15 million damages award, and defense of 15 IPRs.
  • RPost, et al. v. Selligent, Inc. (E.D.Tex.).  Represented defendant Selligent, Inc. and many of its customers in a patent infringement action involving five patents related to email authentication technology. The case was successfully dismissed with prejudice. 
  • Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation, et al. v. Hilti, Inc. (E.D. Wisc., PTAB, Fed. Cir.). Represented defendant Hilti, Inc. in a patent infringement action, and in IPRs, involving lithium based battery packs for use in power tools.
  • Rowpar Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Lornamead, Inc. (D. Ariz.). Represented defendant Lornamead, Inc. in a trade secret misappropriation and patent infringement action involving toothpaste formulations.
  • Phoenix Licensing, L.L.C., et al v. General Motors LLC (E.D.Tex.). Represented defendant General Motors LLC in a patent infringement action involving mass marketing software.
  • Network-1 Security Solutions, Inc. v. Avaya, Inc., et al. (E.D.Tex., PTAB, Fed. Cir.). Represented defendant Avaya Inc. in a patent infringement action, and in an IPR, involving Power over Ethernet (PoE) technology.
  • Spread Spectrum Screening LLC. v. Eastman Kodak Company (N.D. Ill., W.D.N.Y., Fed. Cir.). Represented defendant Eastman Kodak Company in a patent infringement action involving halftone printing software brought by Acacia subsidiary. 
  • Anvik Corporation v. ChiMei InnoLux Corporation (S.D.N.Y., Fed. Cir.). Represented defendant ChiMei InnoLux Corporation in a patent infringement action involving scanning microlithography systems for manufacturing LCD panels.
  • Arlington Industries, Inc. v. Bridgeport Fittings, Inc. (M.D.Pa., Fed. Cir.). Represented plaintiff Arlington Industries in multiple patent infringement actions involving electrical fittings.
  • Weight Watchers International, Inc. v. Curves International, Inc. (S.D.N.Y.). Represented plaintiff Weight Watchers International, Inc. in an action involving trademark infringement and false advertising.
  • In re Certain Machine Vision Software, Machine Vision Systems, and Products Containing Same (ITC, D.Mass.). Represented respondents Fuji America Corp. and Fuji Machine Manufacturing Co., Ltd. in a patent infringement action at ITC and district court involving machine-vision system software.  

Press Coverage

Firm News & Announcements

October 30, 2019 Scott L. Bittman Receives Cornerstone Award for Pro Bono Work from Lawyers Alliance for New York
September 20, 2019 Super Lawyers Recognizes 82 Crowell & Moring Lawyers Across United States
January 25, 2019 LITIGATION NOTE: Crowell & Moring Client Siemens Mobility Inc. Awarded $6.7 Million in IP Suit
October 15, 2018 Super Lawyers Recognizes 82 Crowell & Moring Lawyers Across United States
October 31, 2017 Super Lawyers Recognizes 79 Crowell & Moring Lawyers Across United States
November 30, 2016 Super Lawyers Recognizes 71 Crowell & Moring Lawyers Across United States
October 27, 2015 Super Lawyers Recognizes 90 Crowell & Moring Attorneys
September 30, 2014 Super Lawyers 2014 Recognizes 90 Crowell & Moring Attorneys