1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |Updated Guidance Suggests that Federal Government May Enforce Contractor Vaccine Mandate

Updated Guidance Suggests that Federal Government May Enforce Contractor Vaccine Mandate

Client Alert | 1 min read | 10.18.22

The Safer Federal Workforce Task Force issued updated guidance for federal contractors on October 14, 2022, announcing that it will reevaluate enforcement of the federal contractor vaccine mandate and safety requirements issued under Executive Order 14042.  This is the first pronouncement from the Task Force after it had indicated that it would not enforce the vaccine mandate without further notice in the wake of the Eleventh Circuit’s August 26, 2022 decision limiting the scope of the injunction against implementation and enforcement of the EO 14042 contractor mandate.  The mandate officially narrowing the injunction was issued on October 18. 

In light of the narrowed injunction, the Task Force announced that it will not enforce the vaccine mandate unless and until (i) the Task Force issues new guidance on COVID-19 safety protocols, (ii) OMB determines that guidance would promote economic and efficiency in federal contracting, and (iii) agencies issue written notice to covered contractors in accordance with OMB guidelines.  The Task Force update leaves open the possibility that agencies could include the FAR clause implementing the requirements of the Executive Order in future solicitations and contracts.

In light of this announcement, federal contractors should expect that the Federal Government will not take any action to enforce the clause implementing the EO 14042 contractor mandate where it has already been included in contracts or contract-like instruments, absent further written notice from the agency.

Insights

Client Alert | 4 min read | 12.04.25

District Court Grants Preliminary Injunction Against Seller of Gray Market Snack Food Products

On November 12, 2025, Judge King in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington granted in part Haldiram India Ltd.’s (“Plaintiff” or “Haldiram”) motion for a preliminary injunction against Punjab Trading, Inc. (“Defendant” or “Punjab Trading”), a seller alleged to be importing and distributing gray market snack food products not authorized for sale in the United States. The court found that Haldiram was likely to succeed on the merits of its trademark infringement claim because the products at issue, which were intended for sale in India, were materially different from the versions intended for sale in the U.S., and for this reason were not genuine products when sold in the U.S. Although the court narrowed certain overbroad provisions in the requested order, it ultimately enjoined Punjab Trading from importing, selling, or assisting others in selling the non-genuine Haldiram products in the U.S. market....