Unequal Price Discussions Sink Award
Client Alert | less than 1 min read | 02.06.06
In Sytronics, Inc. (Dec. 29, 2005, http://www.gao.gov/decisions/bidpro/297346.pdf), GAO held that a discussion question to the awardee labeling the proposed price as “excessive” sent a stronger message than one to the protester labeling its proposed price as “high.” Prejudice occurred because, for its final proposal revision, the awardee reduced its already-lower proposed price by a greater percentage than the protester, which allowed it to prevail in a cost-technical tradeoff despite the protester's superior technical proposal.
Insights
Client Alert | 5 min read | 05.12.26
EU Pharma Package: Advertising Compromise Proposal
In our ninth alert in this EU Pharma Package Series, we discussed the proposals of the Commission, Council, and Parliament with respect to advertising of medicinal products.
Client Alert | 6 min read | 05.11.26
FDA’s AI in Early Phase Clinical Trials RFI: An Opportunity to Help Set the Rules of the Road
Client Alert | 4 min read | 05.11.26
New Temporary State Aid Framework Throws A Lifeline To Sectors Hit By The Middle East Crisis
Client Alert | 4 min read | 05.11.26
