Unduly Restrictive Specification Requires Redo
Client Alert | less than 1 min read | 03.24.15
In Smith and Nephew Inc. (Jan. 2, 2015), publicly released this week, GAO sustained a pre-award solicitation protest alleging that the VA had unduly restricted competition with an unnecessary specification requirement. GAO concluded that the "minimum fluid absorption rate" for medical bandages demanded by the VA was not based on any demonstrable agency need, was predicated on one repudiated test study by a single contractor, and could not be met by any commercially available product in the marketplace.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 2 min read | 03.11.26
On March 3, 2026, a bipartisan coalition of state attorneys general and state charity regulators (the “States”) sent a letter[1]to GoFundMe expressing their concerns about GoFundMe's creation of donation web pages for more than 1.4 million charities without their prior knowledge or consent.
Client Alert | 3 min read | 03.11.26
Civil Litigation as a First-Response Strategy: The UK Government's Fraud Strategy 2026–2029
Client Alert | 5 min read | 03.11.26
CJEU Sets the Bar Low for Evidence Disclosure in Competition Damages Litigation
Client Alert | 6 min read | 03.11.26
