1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |U.S.-China High Tech Trade: Time to Break the Ice?

U.S.-China High Tech Trade: Time to Break the Ice?

Client Alert | 2 min read | 10.07.09

On September 29, 2009, delegates from the U.S. Department of Commerce and the People's Republic of China's Ministry of Commerce ("MOFCOM") had an all-day dialogue with representatives of U.S. and Chinese companies in the aerospace, civil aviation and IT industries as a prologue to the fourth U.S.-China High Technology Working Group ("HTWG") meeting. Panelists included Mr. Daniel O. Hill, acting Under Secretary for Industry and Security and Mr. Jiang Yaoping, the vice Minister of MOFCOM in charge of high-tech industry. Co-sponsored by the National Association of the Manufacturers ("NAM"), this was the first time the HTWG meeting was opened up to and solicited candid feedback from the private sector in the high technology industries. While conducted "off-the-record," specific issues that the two governments and private sector are likely to consider going forward emerged:

(1) Overly Stringent or Outdated Export Control Policies: There is a strong sense that U.S. companies are being replaced by European or Japanese competitors as the major suppliers for Chinese companies seeking high technology or related goods abroad. This development may reflect that the U.S. export control policies are overly broad and lag behind technological advancement with respect to high technology sectors.

(2) Ample Business Opportunities: Chinese demand for high technology and trade remains high and continues to grow. Of particular note is the civil aviation industry which is expected to expand rapidly in the coming five years arising out of the need to improve domestic transportation within China by increasing the number of airports and flights in China. Representatives of Chinese companies expressed a desire to cooperate with U.S. companies by way of sub-contracting, high technology transfer and establishment of R&D centers, to name a few.

(3) Topics of Special Interest: Simplification of the licensing procedure, a comprehensive review of the items that require a license as well as an overhaul of encryption were among the topics that interested the attendees the most.

(4) U.S. Export Control Reform: President Obama has announced that the new administration will review the current export control regime and is committed to reform that will work in the best interests of both nations. Export control reform has proven an intractable issue in domestic U.S. politics before so the prospects of any quick resolution remain uncertain at best although the need to establish a cooperative and constructive trading relationship with China may provide the added impetus needed.

Please contact us if you would like more detailed information concerning the specific U.S.-China export control issues.

Insights

Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.21.25

A Sign of What’s to Come? Court Dismisses FCA Retaliation Complaint Based on Alleged Discriminatory Use of Federal Funding

On November 7, 2025, in Thornton v. National Academy of Sciences, No. 25-cv-2155, 2025 WL 3123732 (D.D.C. Nov. 7, 2025), the District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed a False Claims Act (FCA) retaliation complaint on the basis that the plaintiff’s allegations that he was fired after blowing the whistle on purported illegally discriminatory use of federal funding was not sufficient to support his FCA claim. This case appears to be one of the first filed, and subsequently dismissed, following Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche’s announcement of the creation of the Civil Rights Fraud Initiative on May 19, 2025, which “strongly encourages” private individuals to file lawsuits under the FCA relating to purportedly discriminatory and illegal use of federal funding for diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives in violation of Executive Order 14173, Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity (Jan. 21, 2025). In this case, the court dismissed the FCA retaliation claim and rejected the argument that an organization could violate the FCA merely by “engaging in discriminatory conduct while conducting a federally funded study.” The analysis in Thornton could be a sign of how forthcoming arguments of retaliation based on reporting allegedly fraudulent DEI activity will be analyzed in the future....