UK Bribery Act - UK Government succumbs to pressure and delays implementation of the Act
Client Alert | 1 min read | 02.01.11
On January 31 2011, the UK Justice Minister, Ken Clarke, announced that the Bribery Act ("the Act"), which had been due to come into force in April 2011, will be delayed for at least three months. This was confirmation of what many believed would happen after the Government announced, in early January 2011, that there was to be a review of the legislation following growing concerns from UK businesses and trade organisations that the wording of the Act is ambiguous and that it lacks clarity.
The Ministry of Justice has confirmed that the delay will give the Government time to conduct a thorough review and to issue "practical" and "comprehensive" guidance to companies about what measures need to be put in place prior to the Act coming in to force. There has been much debate in the UK (and abroad) as to how specific this guidance should be –particularly given the Act introduces the new corporate offence of failing to prevent bribery, where a violation is uncovered.
Many had also expressed concern about the lack of any real lead in time between the Government's guidance being issued and the Act coming in to force. The Ministry of Justice has, to a degree, recognised this and said yesterday that there would be at least a three month gap between the guidance being issued and the Act coming in to force.
The delay has been criticised by Transparency International and the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD); with the OECD yesterday threatened to put the UK on an export blacklist if the Government continues to delay the implementation of the Act.
Save for any further delays, the Act is now unlikely to come in to force until June/July, at the earliest. Companies with operations in the UK have therefore been given an extra few months to review their Anti-Bribery Polices and Procedures to ensure compliance with the new law.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 4 min read | 12.30.25
Are All Baby Products Related? TTAB Says “No”
The United States Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB or Board) recently issued a refreshed opinion in the trademark dispute Naterra International, Inc. v. Samah Bensalem, where Naterra International, Inc. petitioned the TTAB to cancel Samah Bensalem’s registration for the mark BABIES' MAGIC TEA based on its own BABY MAGIC mark. On remand from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, the TTAB reconsidered an expert’s opinion about relatedness of goods based on the concept of “umbrella branding” and found that the goods are unrelated and therefore again denied the petition for cancellation.
Client Alert | 6 min read | 12.30.25
Investor Advisory Committee Recommends SEC Disclosure Guidelines for Artificial Intelligence
Client Alert | 2 min read | 12.29.25
FYI – GAO Finds Key Person “Available” Despite Accepting Employment with a Different Company
Client Alert | 4 min read | 12.29.25
More Than Math: How Desjardins Recognizes AI Innovations as Patent-Eligible Technology

