Two Bites Allowed If In Different Spots On The Apple
Client Alert | less than 1 min read | 01.06.10
In the latest decision in SUFI Network Servs., Inc. (Dec. 14, 2009), the ASBCA ruled that a motion for reconsideration of its earlier decision on reconsideration was in order, to the extent it challenged new rulings and computations in the reconsideration decision. Applying that rationale, the board found further error in some of its enhanced damages findings on reconsideration and granted additional relief to the contractor, while rejecting other claims as repetitious.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 4 min read | 12.04.25
District Court Grants Preliminary Injunction Against Seller of Gray Market Snack Food Products
On November 12, 2025, Judge King in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington granted in part Haldiram India Ltd.’s (“Plaintiff” or “Haldiram”) motion for a preliminary injunction against Punjab Trading, Inc. (“Defendant” or “Punjab Trading”), a seller alleged to be importing and distributing gray market snack food products not authorized for sale in the United States. The court found that Haldiram was likely to succeed on the merits of its trademark infringement claim because the products at issue, which were intended for sale in India, were materially different from the versions intended for sale in the U.S., and for this reason were not genuine products when sold in the U.S. Although the court narrowed certain overbroad provisions in the requested order, it ultimately enjoined Punjab Trading from importing, selling, or assisting others in selling the non-genuine Haldiram products in the U.S. market.
Client Alert | 21 min read | 12.04.25
Highlights: CMS’s Proposed Rule for Medicare Part C & D (CY 2027 NPRM)
Client Alert | 11 min read | 12.01.25
