Treasury and IRS Announce 2003-2004 Priority Guidance Plan for Employee Benefits Issues
Client Alert | 1 min read | 12.22.03
The Treasury Department's Office of Tax Policy and the IRS have announced their 2003-04 priority guidance plan. This is a list of the items that have been identified as the top areas in which guidance will be provided.
In the retirement benefit area, the list includes guidance on phased retirement arrangements; proposed nondiscrimination regulations for cash balance plans (unless Congress enacts a moratorium on the issuance of such regulations-see V, below); minimum required distribution regulations for qualified plans, guidance on Code Section 403(b) tax-deferred annuity plans, final regulations on S corporation ESOPs, guidance on the Code's age discrimination rules for qualified plans, anti-cutback guidance, guidance on use of electronic technologies for various retirement plan transactions. and model provisions for Code Section 457(b) deferred compensation arrangements.
In the areas of executive compensation, health care and other benefits, the list includes guidance on elections between taxable and nontaxable benefits; guidance on "restricted property" under Code Section 83; guidance on disability payments; guidance on health reimbursement accounts (HRAs); guidance on debit cards; guidance on health care provider incentive payments; and a revenue ruling under Code Section 4980B on Medicare entitlement as a second qualifying event under COBRA.
Insights
Client Alert | 4 min read | 09.15.26
GAO Indicates Reasonable Conflict of Interest Investigation Must Include Inquiry of Involved Firm
The U.S. Government Accountability Office’s (GAO) recent decision in Viderity Inc.—Costs, B-424422.5, Sept. 1, 2026, offers useful insight into what constitutes a legally sufficient conflict of interest investigation. The decision arose in an unusual procedural posture: Viderity initially protested, alleging that an agency evaluator had a personal conflict of interest. After the agency took corrective action, Viderity filed a cost entitlement claim requesting that GAO direct the agency to reimburse Viderity’s protest costs. In evaluating that claim, GAO assessed whether Viderity’s underlying protest ground was “clearly meritorious.”
Client Alert | 3 min read | 09.15.26
Client Alert | 7 min read | 09.14.26
AI in Life Sciences: Ten Legal Considerations and Risks of AI Use in Drug Discovery and Development
Client Alert | 6 min read | 09.14.26
Mental Health Parity Bulletin Restates Best Practices for Evaluating Compliance
