1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |To Disclose or Not To Disclose: Federal Government & Cybersecurity Vulnerabilities

To Disclose or Not To Disclose: Federal Government & Cybersecurity Vulnerabilities

Client Alert | 1 min read | 11.16.17

On November 15, 2017, the White House Cybersecurity Coordinator, Rob Joyce, announced a formative cybersecurity policy entitled “Vulnerabilities Equities Policy and Process for the United States Government.”

According to the policy, the primary focus is to “prioritize the public's interest in cybersecurity and to protect core Internet infrastructure, information systems, critical infrastructure systems, and the U.S. economy through the disclosure of vulnerabilities discovered by the United States Government (USG).” The Vulnerabilities Equities Process (VEP) balances dissemination of vulnerability information (e.g., zero day exploits) to the vendor/supplier in the expectation that it will be patched with temporarily restricting the knowledge of the vulnerability to the USG, and potentially other partners, so that it can be used for national security and law enforcement purposes, such as intelligence collection, military operations, and/or counterintelligence. In striking this balance, the policy aims to increase transparency regarding the process for the public and businesses, and also signals that the US will join with several countries that have announced formal policies in this area regarding management of vulnerabilities. Interestingly, this policy expands the management of vulnerabilities to include a broad array of national security and intelligence agencies.

This policy supersedes the Commercial and Government Information Technology and Industrial Control Product or System Vulnerabilities Equities Policy and Process, dated February 16, 2010.

This policy applies to all USG components and personnel and contractors and includes Government off-the-shelf (GOTS), Commercial off-the-shelf (COTS), or other commercial information systems (to include open-source software), Industrial Control Systems (ICS) or products, and associated systems such as Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) and Distributed Control Systems (DCS).

Businesses and the public will likely be interested in the annual public reporting that is promised, which may include statistics about how many vulnerabilities go through the process and even potentially how long they are withheld from disclosure.

Insights

Client Alert | 4 min read | 05.13.24

Harmonizing AI with EEO Requirements: OFCCP’s Blueprint for Federal Contractors

Now more than ever, federal contractors find themselves at the intersection of innovation and regulation, particularly in the realm of Artificial Intelligence (AI).  AI is now incorporated into a broad range of business systems, including those with the potential to inform contractor employment decisions.  For that reason, the Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) has issued new guidance entitled “Artificial Intelligence and Equal Employment Opportunity for Federal Contractors” (the “AI Guide”).  OFCCP issued the AI Guide in accordance with President Biden’s Executive Order 14110 (regarding the “Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence”), which we reported on here.  The AI Guide provides answers to commonly asked questions about the use of AI in the Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) context.  The AI Guide also offers “Promising Practices,” which highlight a number of important considerations for federal contractors.  Focusing on federal contractors’ obligations and attendant risks when utilizing AI to assist in employment-related decisions, the AI Guide also provides recommendations for ensuring compliance with EEO requirements while harnessing the efficiencies of AI....