1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |The Long Tail Of Government Contracts

The Long Tail Of Government Contracts

Client Alert | 1 min read | 08.26.04

In the latest in a series of appellate decision concerning the Government's liability to reimburse contractors under World War II cost-reimbursement contracts for their liability to clean up environmental contamination, the Federal Circuit in Ford Motor Co. v. U.S. (Aug. 10, 2004) has upheld the contractor's reservation of the right to recover costs that were first incurred nearly 50 years after the contract was completed and "settled." The Court's broad reading of a provision reserving the contractor's right to indemnification for "[c]laims of the Contractor against the Government which are based upon responsibility of the Contractor to Third parties . . . and which involve costs reimbursable under the Contract . . . but which are not now known to the Officers, Directors, or other personnel of the Contractor whose duties include the acquisition of such knowledge" and a definition of reimbursable costs that included "loss or destruction of or damage to property as may arise out of or in connection with the performance of the work under this contract" suggests that most World War II-era contractors facing liability for environmental remediation will be entitled to indemnification under contractual provisions that were then standard in closing out war contracts.

Insights

Client Alert | 5 min read | 08.21.26

FTC Proposes Enforcement Policy Statement on Personalized Pricing: What Businesses Need to Know

On August 19, 2026, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced a proposed Enforcement Policy Statement on personalized pricing — the practice of companies using consumers’ personal data to set individualized prices, discounts, coupons, or other incentives. The proposed statement, which is open for public comment for 30 days following publication in the Federal Register, marks a major step up in the FTC’s focus on data-driven pricing strategies and puts businesses across industries on notice that undisclosed or inadequately disclosed personalized pricing will not be tolerated. Importantly, while the proposed statement is not a binding legal requirement and does not create new legal obligations, it serves as an enforcement warning that the FTC is prepared to use its existing enforcement authority under Section 5 of the FTC Act (Section 5) and is also a potential harbinger of rulemaking. Businesses that engage in — or are considering — personalized pricing should carefully assess their disclosure practices and data collection procedures against the standards articulated in this statement....