The Long Tail Of Government Contracts
Client Alert | 1 min read | 08.26.04
In the latest in a series of appellate decision concerning the Government's liability to reimburse contractors under World War II cost-reimbursement contracts for their liability to clean up environmental contamination, the Federal Circuit in Ford Motor Co. v. U.S. (Aug. 10, 2004) has upheld the contractor's reservation of the right to recover costs that were first incurred nearly 50 years after the contract was completed and "settled." The Court's broad reading of a provision reserving the contractor's right to indemnification for "[c]laims of the Contractor against the Government which are based upon responsibility of the Contractor to Third parties . . . and which involve costs reimbursable under the Contract . . . but which are not now known to the Officers, Directors, or other personnel of the Contractor whose duties include the acquisition of such knowledge" and a definition of reimbursable costs that included "loss or destruction of or damage to property as may arise out of or in connection with the performance of the work under this contract" suggests that most World War II-era contractors facing liability for environmental remediation will be entitled to indemnification under contractual provisions that were then standard in closing out war contracts.
Insights
Client Alert | 4 min read | 12.04.25
District Court Grants Preliminary Injunction Against Seller of Gray Market Snack Food Products
On November 12, 2025, Judge King in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington granted in part Haldiram India Ltd.’s (“Plaintiff” or “Haldiram”) motion for a preliminary injunction against Punjab Trading, Inc. (“Defendant” or “Punjab Trading”), a seller alleged to be importing and distributing gray market snack food products not authorized for sale in the United States. The court found that Haldiram was likely to succeed on the merits of its trademark infringement claim because the products at issue, which were intended for sale in India, were materially different from the versions intended for sale in the U.S., and for this reason were not genuine products when sold in the U.S. Although the court narrowed certain overbroad provisions in the requested order, it ultimately enjoined Punjab Trading from importing, selling, or assisting others in selling the non-genuine Haldiram products in the U.S. market.
Client Alert | 21 min read | 12.04.25
Highlights: CMS’s Proposed Rule for Medicare Part C & D (CY 2027 NPRM)
Client Alert | 11 min read | 12.01.25
