Tele-Hacking: Video Conference Hijacking and Steps You Can Take To Mitigate The Risk and Respond
Client Alert | 1 min read | 04.03.20
The world’s shift to video-teleconferencing (VTC) in the wake of COVID-19 has presented an opportunity for sophisticated hackers to infiltrate digital meetings and access confidential and proprietary information. This expanding threat has important implications for everyone in the public and private sectors using any VTC platform.
Privacy and security issues in VTCs may pose immediate business, economic, and national security risks. For example, reports suggest a world leader shared screenshots of national security issues during a VTC, raising concerns that national secrets may be compromised. For the private sector, the risks could also be significant. A tele-hacker could obtain access to and trade on inside information, steal trade secrets, or publicly disseminate sensitive and confidential information (or hold that information hostage for a sizeable ransom). To protect against these threats, public and private sector actors should revisit their cybersecurity policies, coordinate with VTC vendors, and ensure a mitigation plan is in place.
For businesses making such services available, redoubling cybersecurity and compliance efforts, and communicating best practices to customers, and users alike, is critical.
Law enforcement is also monitoring these trends. The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) recently released guidance specific to mitigating the risk of tele-hacking with VTC, which businesses may use to benchmark their efforts:
- Make meetings private by requiring a password or controlling the admittance of guests.
- Limit distribution of teleconference links.
- Limit screen sharing to “Host Only” to prevent people and unintended participants from taking over and sharing images or content that is inappropriate or alarming.
- Constantly monitor for software updates.
- When selecting a VTC vendor, consider what security measures those vendors offer, such as end-to-end encryption.
If you believe you are a victim of a tele-hack, it is important to execute your incident response plan and consult technical and legal professionals to help with remediation and analyzing any disclosure obligations to the government, customers, or others.
Contacts

Partner, Crowell Global Advisors Senior Director
- Washington, D.C.
- D | +1.202.624.2698
- Washington, D.C. (CGA)
- D | +1 202.624.2500
Insights
Client Alert | 4 min read | 12.30.25
Are All Baby Products Related? TTAB Says “No”
The United States Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (TTAB or Board) recently issued a refreshed opinion in the trademark dispute Naterra International, Inc. v. Samah Bensalem, where Naterra International, Inc. petitioned the TTAB to cancel Samah Bensalem’s registration for the mark BABIES' MAGIC TEA based on its own BABY MAGIC mark. On remand from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, the TTAB reconsidered an expert’s opinion about relatedness of goods based on the concept of “umbrella branding” and found that the goods are unrelated and therefore again denied the petition for cancellation.
Client Alert | 6 min read | 12.30.25
Investor Advisory Committee Recommends SEC Disclosure Guidelines for Artificial Intelligence
Client Alert | 2 min read | 12.29.25
FYI – GAO Finds Key Person “Available” Despite Accepting Employment with a Different Company
Client Alert | 4 min read | 12.29.25
More Than Math: How Desjardins Recognizes AI Innovations as Patent-Eligible Technology
