Supreme Court Hears Argument on Implied Certification Theory
Client Alert | 1 min read | 04.20.16
On April 19, 2016, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in U.S. v. Universal Health Servs., Inc., which concerns (1) whether the implied certification theory of legal falsity under the FCA is ever viable; and (2) if it is, whether a contractor’s reimbursement claim can be legally false under that theory if the contractor fails to comply with a statute, regulation, or contractual provision that is not an explicit condition of payment. In a post on the Whistleblower Watch Blog, C&M attorneys share first impressions from yesterday’s argument and examine the significance of the case for government contractors who could face potential FCA exposure for failure to comply with myriad contract provisions or regulations.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 5 min read | 05.19.26
DOJ Continues Attempt to Block State-Court Climate Suits with Minnesota Complaint
On May 4, 2026, the U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) filed a federal complaint seeking to enjoin Minnesota’s state-court climate lawsuit against major energy companies. DOJ contends that Minnesota’s claims—which target global greenhouse gas emissions—intrude on exclusive federal authority. The complaint asserts that Minnesota’s lawsuit violates the dormant Commerce Clause and is preempted based on uniquely federal interests, the prohibition on extraterritorial state regulation, the Clean Air Act (“CAA”), and the Foreign Affairs doctrine.
Client Alert | 5 min read | 05.19.26
Qatar's Judicial Enforcement Law No. 4 of 2024: A Reminder of Qatar’s Landmark Reform
Client Alert | 4 min read | 05.18.26
(Not) All’s Weld That Ends Weld: Duty Evasion Scheme Ends in Historic $549.5M FCA Settlement
Client Alert | 7 min read | 05.18.26
