Strong Mitigating Factors Trump Debarment
Client Alert | less than 1 min read | 07.30.07
In Canales v. Paulson (D.D.C. July 16, 2007, https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2006cv1330-47), the federal district court overturned a Treasury Department debarment from government contracting on the ground that the debarring official did not explain reasons for debarment in the face of strong mitigating factors (spotless record before the offense; five years since the incident; extensive business with the government in the interim; misdemeanor conviction) presented to him at the debarment proceeding.
Insights
Client Alert | 6 min read | 02.18.26
The CeramTec Case, or How to (not) Navigate the Patent to Trademark Transition
The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) recently delivered its judgment in the CeramTec case (C-17/24).
Client Alert | 4 min read | 02.17.26
Texas Federal Court Hands Cyber Policyholders Major Win in Southwest Airlines Coverage Dispute
Client Alert | 3 min read | 02.13.26
Client Alert | 12 min read | 02.13.26
What Organ Procurement Organizations Need to Know About CMS's New Proposed Rule
