1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |State of New York Files Suit Against Federal Agencies Seeking Environmental Review of Natural Gas Development in the Delaware River Basin

State of New York Files Suit Against Federal Agencies Seeking Environmental Review of Natural Gas Development in the Delaware River Basin

Client Alert | 1 min read | 06.02.11

On May 31, 2011, the State of New York sued various federal agencies and agency officials in the Eastern District of New York alleging that the agencies and officials violated the National Environmental Policy Act ("NEPA") by allowing regulations proposed by the Delaware River Basin Commission ("DRBC") that would authorize natural gas development, including hydraulic fracturing, in the Delaware River Basin to move forward without first studying their environmental effects and preparing an environmental impact statement. The DRBC is a regional body comprised of state and federal officials that regulates and manages the water resources of the Delaware River Basin. New York asserts that the development of the DRBC regulations is a "federal action" that triggers NEPA review because the defendant federal agencies - including the Corps of Engineers, the Fish and Wildlife Service, the National Park Service, the Department of the Interior, and the Environmental Protection Agency - "play a significant role" in the development of the regulations and "have authority to approve the DRBC Regulations."

According to the Complaint, the proposed DRBC regulations would lead to the development of 15,000 to 18,000 natural gas wells within the Delaware River Basin. Focusing on potential environmental impacts of hydraulic fracturing, New York alleges that the proposed natural gas development would endanger New York's unfiltered drinking water supply and the use of the Upper Delaware River for recreational and conservation purposes, and also cause air pollution and contribute to climate change.

The Complaint notes that DRBC proposed the regulations over the objections of former New York governor David Paterson. Hydraulic fracturing has been a contentious issue in New York. In December 2010, Governor Paterson signed an executive order banning high volume, horizontal hydraulic fracturing in New York through July 1, 2011. This year, several bills have been introduced in the New York State Assembly to restrict or regulate hydraulic fracturing in the state.

For a copy of the complaint, click here.

Contacts

Insights

Client Alert | 5 min read | 12.12.25

Eleventh Circuit Hears Argument on False Claims Act Qui Tam Constitutionality

On the morning of December 12, 2025, the Eleventh Circuit heard argument in United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Florida Medical Associates, LLC, et al., No. 24-13581 (11th Cir. 2025). This case concerns the constitutionality of the False Claims Act (FCA) qui tam provisions and a groundbreaking September 2024 opinion in which the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida held that the FCA’s qui tam provisions were unconstitutional under Article II. See United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Fla. Med. Assocs., LLC, 751 F. Supp. 3d 1293 (M.D. Fla. 2024). That decision, penned by District Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle, was the first success story for a legal theory that has been gaining steam ever since Justices Thomas, Barrett, and Kavanaugh indicated they would be willing to consider arguments about the constitutionality of the qui tam provisions in U.S. ex rel. Polansky v. Exec. Health Res., 599 U.S. 419 (2023). In her opinion, Judge Mizelle held (1) qui tam relators are officers of the U.S. who must be appointed under the Appointments Clause; and (2) historical practice treating qui tam and similar relators as less than “officers” for constitutional purposes was not enough to save the qui tam provisions from the fundamental Article II infirmity the court identified. That ruling was appealed and, after full briefing, including by the government and a bevy of amici, the litigants stepped up to the plate this morning for oral argument....

View All Insights