State Attorneys General Update: COVID-19 Crisis
Client Alert | 1 min read | 03.27.20
During times of disaster such as the COVID-19 crisis, State Attorneys General are focused on consumer protection and charity scams. Top issues we have seen to date include:
- Price Gouging: Attorneys General are very active ensuring consumers are not being price gouged for products and services in high demand. They are focused on retailers, and companies in the supply chains for both brick and mortar and online retailers. Attorneys General are also working with online platforms for third-party sellers to stop price gouging.
- False Advertising: Many states have sounded the alarm over product claims that either prevent or cure COVID-19 or related health claims. A company’s claim about the value of their products or services regarding the virus or other similar issues should expect scrutiny by the AGs and their staff. Some states have also identified scammers, including falsely offering credit for COVID-19 testing kits to induce consumers to provide their account information and mailing address.
- Refunds and Cancellations: Many Attorneys General are seeking to protect consumers from a diminution, interruption or cancellation of on-going contracts for goods and services that are interrupted because of cancellations or inability to perform.
- Charities: Attorneys General are issuing warnings to consumers of fake charities raising money for phony victims of the COVID-19 disease. Attorneys General will also look at the accuracy of promotional sales to benefit charities when retail advertisers promise a portion of each sale to a specified charity.
Insights
Client Alert | 4 min read | 12.04.25
District Court Grants Preliminary Injunction Against Seller of Gray Market Snack Food Products
On November 12, 2025, Judge King in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington granted in part Haldiram India Ltd.’s (“Plaintiff” or “Haldiram”) motion for a preliminary injunction against Punjab Trading, Inc. (“Defendant” or “Punjab Trading”), a seller alleged to be importing and distributing gray market snack food products not authorized for sale in the United States. The court found that Haldiram was likely to succeed on the merits of its trademark infringement claim because the products at issue, which were intended for sale in India, were materially different from the versions intended for sale in the U.S., and for this reason were not genuine products when sold in the U.S. Although the court narrowed certain overbroad provisions in the requested order, it ultimately enjoined Punjab Trading from importing, selling, or assisting others in selling the non-genuine Haldiram products in the U.S. market.
Client Alert | 21 min read | 12.04.25
Highlights: CMS’s Proposed Rule for Medicare Part C & D (CY 2027 NPRM)
Client Alert | 11 min read | 12.01.25
