All Alerts & Newsletters

Solicitation Must Adequately Evaluate Contract Type and Not Have Arbitrary Disqualifications

Sep.09.2016

In CACI, Inc.-Federal (Aug. 3, 2016), GAO sustained two pre-award challenges to the cost/price evaluation scheme in DISA’s $17.5B ENCORE III IDIQ solicitation. GAO held, first, that the solicitation did not provide an adequate basis to compare the relative cost of competing proposals because, despite anticipating roughly half of the ENCORE III task orders to be cost-reimbursable, the RFP did not require offerors to propose any cost-reimbursable labor rates and, second, that a provision that would eliminate any offeror with a total price more than 50 percent below a “trimmed average total proposed price” of other offerors was “entirely arbitrary in selection and application” because the record did not reflect that such a price difference would pose any inherently high performance risk.

Email Twitter LinkedIn Facebook Google+

For more information, please contact the professional(s) listed below, or your regular Crowell & Moring contact.

John E. McCarthy Jr.
Partner – Washington, D.C.
Phone: +1 202.624.2579
Email: jmccarthy@crowell.com

Robert J. Sneckenberg
Associate – Washington, D.C.
Phone: +1 202.624.2874
Email: rsneckenberg@crowell.com

Hart W. Wood
Associate – Washington, D.C.
Phone: +1 202.624.2979
Email: hwood@crowell.com