1. Home
  2. |Insights
  3. |SEC Disclosure Requirements for State Sponsors of Terrorism

SEC Disclosure Requirements for State Sponsors of Terrorism

Client Alert | 1 min read | 12.04.07

In an effort to provide investors with greater transparency as to public issuers’ disclosures concerning their activities with terrorist-sponsoring countries, the SEC, in June 2007, released a web tool listing "Companies' Activities in Countries Known to Sponsor Terrorism." However, in response to the receipt of numerous complaints concerning the web tool, the SEC removed the list and announced its plan to re-launch the "reference tool" after it addressed the voiced concerns.


The SEC has just issued a Concept Release "soliciting comment about whether it should develop mechanisms to facilitate greater access to companies' disclosures concerning their business activities in or with countries designated as State Sponsors of Terrorism." Specifically, the release seeks public comment on whether it is appropriate to provide easier access to such information, whether the SEC should pursue one of the alternative means to accomplish easier access (e.g., improving the web tool or providing companies with the means to utilize data tagging of relevant information), and any other issues relating to access improvements and the benefits and costs of providing improved access to companies' disclosures. At this time, the Concept Release does not include a list of companies that have made disclosures regarding business activities with State Sponsors of Terrorism (as identified by the U.S. Department of State). The Concept Release may be viewed here http://www.sec.gov/rules/concept/2007/33-8860.pdf. The deadline for submitting a comment is January 22, 2008.


The SEC’s enhanced focus on public issuers’ disclosures concerning business activities with State Sponsors of Terrorism raises questions as to how companies should, and do, disclose such activities in public filings. Through Crowell & Moring’s broad SEC-reporting and trade sanctions expertise, we can aid public companies in dealing with the potential new reporting regime imposed by the SEC.


Insights

Client Alert | 3 min read | 11.21.25

A Sign of What’s to Come? Court Dismisses FCA Retaliation Complaint Based on Alleged Discriminatory Use of Federal Funding

On November 7, 2025, in Thornton v. National Academy of Sciences, No. 25-cv-2155, 2025 WL 3123732 (D.D.C. Nov. 7, 2025), the District Court for the District of Columbia dismissed a False Claims Act (FCA) retaliation complaint on the basis that the plaintiff’s allegations that he was fired after blowing the whistle on purported illegally discriminatory use of federal funding was not sufficient to support his FCA claim. This case appears to be one of the first filed, and subsequently dismissed, following Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche’s announcement of the creation of the Civil Rights Fraud Initiative on May 19, 2025, which “strongly encourages” private individuals to file lawsuits under the FCA relating to purportedly discriminatory and illegal use of federal funding for diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives in violation of Executive Order 14173, Ending Illegal Discrimination and Restoring Merit-Based Opportunity (Jan. 21, 2025). In this case, the court dismissed the FCA retaliation claim and rejected the argument that an organization could violate the FCA merely by “engaging in discriminatory conduct while conducting a federally funded study.” The analysis in Thornton could be a sign of how forthcoming arguments of retaliation based on reporting allegedly fraudulent DEI activity will be analyzed in the future....