All Alerts & Newsletters

Proposed OSHA Noise Regulations Reverse Long-Standing Interpretations And Increase Potential Costs To Employers

Nov.24.2010

On October 19, 2010, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration proposed changes to occupational noise standards that would significantly increase the cost and burden of compliance by employers in industry and the construction trades. The new interpretations change the focus of noise protection efforts from cost-effective and well-established personal protective equipment ("PPE") such as earplugs to substantially more expensive administrative and engineering controls such as replacing equipment with quieter models or isolating equipment away from employees.

Currently, administrative and engineering controls are generally unnecessary if PPE sufficiently protects employees from noise. Under the proposed regulations, however, implementing administrative and engineering controls would become a mandatory first step, replacing PPE as the primary form of protection. While recognizing that "effective engineering and administrative controls almost always cost more than [use of PPE]," OSHA explains that "the current policy thwarts the safety and health purposes of the OSH Act by rarely requiring administrative and engineering controls even though these controls are generally more effective than hearing protectors in reducing noise exposure." 75 Fed. Reg. 64216 (Oct. 19, 2010).

The threshold for implementation of administrative and engineering controls appears to be very low, as controls would be required whenever they are "achievable" or "capable of being done." An employer could avoid implementing administrative and engineering controls only if the possible controls are not standard in the industry and the expense of implementing them would "threaten the employer's ability to remain in business."

The impact of OSHA's new interpretation will undoubtedly be extensive, as the requirements apply to any noise above 90 decibels, i.e., just slightly more than the average vacuum cleaner or garbage disposal. Given the significant potential for expense and the wide-ranging application of the proposed regulations, employers and trade associations are encouraged to consider submitting comments on the proposed changes by December 20, 2010. Employers should also consider undertaking a preemptive assessment of noise hazards and feasible administrative and engineering controls.

If you have any questions about the impact of the proposed changes to OSHA's noise regulations, please contact any of the attorneys listed below or your regular Crowell & Moring contact.

Email Twitter LinkedIn Facebook Google+

For more information, please contact the professional(s) listed below, or your regular Crowell & Moring contact.

Kevin C. Mayer
Partner – Los Angeles, San Francisco
Phone: +1 213.443.5544, +1 415.365.7473
Email: kmayer@crowell.com

Clifford J. Zatz
Partner – Washington, D.C.
Phone: +1 202.624.2810
Email: czatz@crowell.com

Jeffrey W. Pagano
Partner – New York
Phone: +1 212.895.4208
Email: jpagano@crowell.com

Ira M. Saxe
Partner – New York
Phone: +1 212.895.4230
Email: isaxe@crowell.com