Privacy Shield Formally Adopted: Self-Certifications Start August 1, 2016
Client Alert | 2 min read | 07.13.16
The European Commission, alongside the U.S. Department of Commerce, on July 12 announced the final adoption of the EU-U.S. Privacy Shield (Privacy Shield), the legal framework that replaces the previously invalidated U.S.-EU Safe Harbor (Safe Harbor) framework for transatlantic data transfers. Companies will be able to self-certify under the new regime starting August 1, 2016.
History of the Negotiation
The European Parliament, as well as a committee of representatives of the EU Member States and their data protection authorities (Article 29 Working Party) initially criticized the Privacy Shield documents and principles first released on February 29, 2016. As a result of the criticism, the European Commission in close cooperation with the U.S. authorities, clarified and improved the initial Privacy Shield documents. On July 8, 2016, the European Union (EU) Member States in their function as the Article 31 Committee approved this amended version of the Privacy Shield.
The amendments include more explicit declarations of the European Commission regarding obligations of companies in relation to limits on personal data retention and onward transfers. The U.S. authorities in turn provided additional clarifications regarding the bulk collection of data, and have strengthened the Ombudsperson mechanism within the U.S. Department of State (a newly formed position created to address EU citizens’ concerns regarding the collection of data for national security purposes).
Future Legal Challenges
Throughout the negotiations, critics have warned of a legal challenge to the Privacy Shield. That criticism continues. Privacy activist Max Schrems as well as EU Member of Parliament Jan-Philipp Albrecht are already on record criticizing the new framework. However, the European Commission leadership stood by their final adequacy finding on July 12 with robust statements supporting their belief in the new framework’s ability to reflect the requirements laid out in the European Court of Justice’s October 2015 judgment ruling Safe Harbor invalid.
The EU data protection authorities are set to meet and discuss the final Privacy Shield documents on July 25, 2016. A resolution of the European Parliament on the Privacy Shield is planned for September 2016. The outcome of both processes may influence future policy or European Court of Justice decisions, but neither body is able to invalidate the European Commission’s Privacy Shield adequacy finding. Though there may be political or legal challenges to the Privacy Shield, the European Court of Justice in its October 2015 judgment made clear that it alone has the authority to invalidate adequacy findings like the one Privacy Shield just received.
Timeline for Implementation
The U.S. Department of Commerce is set to begin accepting applications for self-certification under the Privacy Shield starting August 1, 2016. Until then, companies that want to transfer personal data from the EU to the U.S. must continue using other data transfer mechanisms, such as approved Binding Corporate Rules (BCRs) or EU Standard Contractual Clauses.
Companies that wish to adhere to the new Privacy Shield data transfer framework, whether or not they were previously Safe Harbor certified, should begin to review the Privacy Shield and seek legal advice to discuss changes needed to ensure compliance with the requirements of the new framework.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 4 min read | 05.01.26
Federal Court Blocks Trump Administration Policies Restricting Wind and Solar Permitting
A coalition of regional clean energy trade associations — including RENEW Northeast, Alliance for Clean Energy New York, Southern Renewable Energy Association, and Interwest Energy Alliance — along with the Green Energy Consumers Alliance (GECA), filed suit in December 2025 against the Department of the Interior (DOI), the Bureau of Land Management, the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS), and the Army Corps of Engineers. The complaint alleged that five agency actions, issued in response to a series of executive orders and presidential memoranda beginning on January 20, 2025, violated the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) by arbitrarily halting or restricting federal permitting for wind and solar energy projects. Plaintiffs sought a preliminary injunction to halt enforcement of these policies while the litigation proceeds. See Renew Northeast, et al. v. U.S. Dep’t of Interior, et al., No. 25-cv-13961-DJC, (D. Mass. Apr. 21, 2026) ECF Dkt. 89.
Client Alert | 2 min read | 05.01.26
New Executive Order Promoting Fixed Price Contracting: What It Means for Federal Contractors
Client Alert | 8 min read | 05.01.26
Pre-Approved: ICO Publishes Guidance on "Recognised Legitimate Interests”
Client Alert | 6 min read | 04.29.26
CMS Seeks to Expand Interoperability Requirements to Drug Pre-Authorization (FAQ)




