Price Realism Requirement Must Be Stated to Allow Unacceptability Finding
Client Alert | 1 min read | 11.25.15
In W.P. Tax & Accounting Group (Nov. 13, 2015), GAO reminded agencies that, in fixed-price procurements, below-cost pricing is not inherently improper and cannot serve as the basis for a technical unacceptability finding when the solicitation does not provide for a price realism evaluation. Because the solicitation in W.P. said nothing about a price realism evaluation, GAO overturned the agency's rejection of the low-priced vendor's quotation as technically unacceptable and recommended that the agency either reevaluate the vendor's quotation against the stated evaluation criteria or amend the solicitation to provide for a price realism evaluation.
Contacts
Insights
Client Alert | 3 min read | 02.17.26
Some AI Chats Aren’t Privileged: What Judge Rakoff’s Ruling Means for You
AI tools have significantly transformed how companies operate, but they come with serious legal risks that are only now taking shape. A recent ruling by a federal judge in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York highlights one such risk: certain inputs and outputs from AI models may not be considered privileged attorney-client communications or protected by the work-product doctrine.
Client Alert | 4 min read | 02.17.26
Texas Federal Court Hands Cyber Policyholders Major Win in Southwest Airlines Coverage Dispute
Client Alert | 3 min read | 02.13.26
Client Alert | 12 min read | 02.13.26
What Organ Procurement Organizations Need to Know About CMS's New Proposed Rule
